Thursday 26 May 2022
- Advertisement -

Youth Congress leader has problem with ‘no Muslim in temple festival’

Youth Congress leader Mithun Rai defies the Hindu Religious Institutions & Charitable Endowments Act prohibiting non-Hindus from leasing land near Hindu shrines

Join Sirf News on

and/or

Youth Congress leader Mithun Rai has vehemently deplored the banners displaying “No permission for business to Muslim traders during temple festivals”. He has threatened to gherao (cordon off) the district administration office if they do not take action. But the Karnataka government defends the decision by the temples to ban Muslim traders during religious festivals. It cited law to argue in the assembly that no people other than Hindus could be allowed inside temple premises during fairs and holy occasions.

The Youth Congress leader said, “The Mulky Bappanadu temple is known for its communal harmony. During the annual temple fair, nearly 1.5 lakh jasmine units are offered to Devi. This jasmine is grown by the Christians of Shankarapura, sold by Muslims and offered to the goddess by Hindus.”

In the assembly, state law minister JC Madhuswamy said according to the Hindu Religious Institutions And Charitable Endowments Act, passed in 2002, it is prohibited to lease out the space near a Hindu religious institution to a person of another faith.

“If these recent incidents of banning Muslim traders have occurred outside the premises of the religious institutions, we will rectify them. Otherwise, as per norms, no other community is allowed to set up shop on the premises,” the minister said, pointing out that the Karnataka government in 2002 was run by the INC.

But the Youth Congress leader says, “The main photograph on the chariot of Bappanadu is that of Bappa Byari. This holy place is a model to the whole country. Chaos has been created by displaying the controversial banner. The administrative committee says that they have not put up the said banner. People of the district are confused because of the banner. Why has the district administration still not removed the unauthorised banner? Why is it hesitating? The delay in the removal of the banner by the district administration has been adding to the chaos. This clearly shows that the district administration is instigating such acts. Will the Goddess approve the work of such antisocial elements.”

“If the district administration does not take action on the culprits, we will gherao the department,” the Youth Congress leader threatened.

The state’s law and education minister, however, backed the ban instituted by at least six temples in the past week, and Chief Minister Basavaraj Bommai said the government could not interfere if the ban was legal. Over the last five days, banners have emerged outside temples in Udupi, Dakshina Kannada and Shivamooga districts announcing that Muslim traders will not be allowed to set up stalls in religious fairs, breaking from decades-old local traditions.

Bommai defended the law minister and said that as per law, non-Hindus were not allowed to put up stalls near temples during festivals. “During such jathres (religious fairs), there are a lots of shops that are sub-leased. These people who take up the lease from the temple management board would do it for money. This is something that the government cannot interfere in. When it is such cases, we will look into the laws as well as the facts of the case,” Bommai said.

Outside the assembly, education minister BC Nagesh justified the ban as a “reaction” to the observed over the Karnataka high court’s recent verdict upholding a ban on the hijab in classrooms. “There is always a reaction for anything. People of science know that action and reaction are equal and opposite,” Nagesh said.

The statements came amid swirling controversy over several temple authorities across Karnataka denying Muslim shopkeepers permission to set up stalls in popular Hindu religious fairs, where usually members of all faiths do business alongside each other. The posters have come up in communally sensitive districts of coastal Karnataka, which were already on the boil over the state government’s decision in January to ban the hijab in classrooms, and the ensuing controversy.

The Hosa Marigudi temple in Mangaluru barred Muslim traders from taking part in the auction for stalls at the annual Suggi Mari Pooja on 22 March. Then on 23 March, at the Kote Marikamba Jatre in Shivamogga, which is held every two years, a contractor cancelled the tender he received for allotting stalls after he was asked the temple committee to cancel the stalls given to Muslims.

The Kollur Mookambika temple fair in Udupi district announced the ban on Tuesday. On the same day, banners announcing the ban on Muslim traders were placed in front of the Bappandu Durgaparameshwari temple,. Mangaladevi temple and Puttur Mahalingeshwara temple. “No permission for those who are against Constitution and those who kill cattle,” a banner read.

The issue was raised by the deputy leader of the Opposition, UT Kader, and Congress legislator Rizwan Arshad. Kader said that people who were “cowards and cruel humans” put up such posters, stoking protest from several Bharatiya Janata Party legislators. “Don’t the police know who are putting up such posters. We ask the government that whoever has put these banners, what is their intent and take action against such people and give a proper message to society,” Kader said.

In Mangaluru, the president of the Hosa Marigudi temple management committee, Ramesh Hegde, said that ban was clamped after an appeal from Hindu organisations. “They said that those who do not respect the high court’s decision will not be allowed to enter the temple festival. We didn’t want a law and order problem, so we have taken this decision,” he added.

In Shivamogga, too, a temple official, who requested anonymity, said Hindu activists asked the local temple committee to cancel the allotment of stalls to Muslim traders.

The official added that for several years, Muslims and Christians were taking part in the festival and offering prayers to fulfil their wishes.

K Mariyappa, president of Kote Marikamba Jatre committee, told reporters that there was pressure to institute the ban. “The committee was never communal in the past but recent developments, especially on social media, where many have launched campaigns against Muslims shopkeepers, forced them to agree to the demand in the interest of smooth conduct of the festival,” he said.

Prakash Kukkehalli, the Hindu Jagarana Vedike’s Mangaluru division general secretary, said that some temple worshippers were outraged by Muslims closing their shops in protest on the March 17 high court order upholding the ban on wearing of Hijab in classrooms. “If they can oppose the Karnataka high court, why can’t we stop them? We are asking Hindus to be self-sufficient and make sure that our businesses are not stolen by the Muslims,” he said. Bajrang Dal leader Suryanarayana Rao said the organisation was not against Muslims but only those who opposed the rule of the land and the high court verdict on Hijab.

Mohammed Arif, the secretary of Udupi District Street Vendors’ and Traders’ Association, said Muslim traders had not been banned in such a manner before. “There are about 700 registered members of which 450 are Muslim. We did not have any business for the last two years because of Covid-19. Now as we begin to start earning again, we have been left out by the temple committees,” he told reporters.

Muslim traders have expressed both grief and anguish about the development. “We cannot live without the help of Hindus, but at the same time, it was outright unethical and unjustified for a few Hindu fringe elements to block Muslim traders in temple fairs,” said a trader.

Responding to the government’s explanation, former Karnataka advocate general, senior counsel and constitutional expert Professor Ravi Varma Kumar said that the Hindu Religious Institutions And Charitable Endowments Act. “This is discrimination purely on the basis of religion. This is impermissible. The act has to be challenged on that grounds. As long as they are contracts given by the government, the government cannot discriminate on the grounds of religion,” Kumar said.

“If they are private temples the question of raising the constitutional issue does not arise. Because fundamental rights are guaranteed only against the government. But temples under Muzrai department, these (constitutional rights) are applicable,” he said.

Contribute to our cause

Contribute to the nation's cause

Sirf News needs to recruit journalists in large numbers to increase the volume of its reports and articles to at least 100 a day, which will make us mainstream, which is necessary to challenge the anti-India discourse by established media houses. Besides there are monthly liabilities like the subscription fees of news agencies, the cost of a dedicated server, office maintenance, marketing expenses, etc. Donation is our only source of income. Please serve the cause of the nation by donating generously.

Join Sirf News on

and/or

Similar Articles

Comments

Scan to donate

Swadharma QR Code
Advertisment
Sirf News Facebook Page QR Code
Facebook page of Sirf News: Scan to like and follow

Most Popular

[prisna-google-website-translator]
%d bloggers like this: