18.4 C
New Delhi
Saturday 7 December 2019
India Women may continue to enter Sabarimala but case isn't...

Women may continue to enter Sabarimala but case isn’t over

The petitioners say women who want to enter Sabarimala are not Ayyappa devotees in the first place and so they cannot be an aggrieved party

The Supreme Court has refused to ban the entry of women into the Sabarimala shrine of Lord Ayyappa as of now. However, the court has referred the matter to a larger bench. Now a seven-judge bench will deliberate upon this case. This happened after the two judges in the existing bench disagreed to arrive at an agreement on the issue.

While hearing the Sabarimala case, the Supreme Court said that the case would not only affect this particular temple but also the entry of women in mosques and the entry of Parsi women in Agariya. The Supreme Court said that traditions should be in accordance with the supremely accepted rules of religion. With this, the Supreme Court has handed over the Sabarimala case to a larger bench. Now a bench of seven judges will hear this matter. On Thursday, a five-judge bench referred the matter to a larger bench with a 3:2 decision.

Until a few years ago, menstruating women were not allowed to enter the Sabarimala temple in Kerala. In the past few years, the issue was raised in the Supreme Court by some feminist organisations, after which the Supreme Court ruled in their favour. The court, in its judgment, allowed women to enter the temple.

A review petition was filed before the bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi against this verdict of the court, citing tradition and religious issues. Hearing this matter, the Supreme Court has allowed a status quo on its previous judgment.

Earlier, on 28 September 2018, the Supreme Court had given a decision allowing all women to enter the temple. The court had said that preventing the entry of women into the temple on the basis of gender was a discriminatory practice, which violated the fundamental right of women.

The review petitioners, on the other hand, argued that the women who wanted to enter the Sabarimala temple were not members of the sect in the first place and that these women activists were merely making a political point before which they had never shown any interest in Sabarimala.

Advocate J Sai Deepak who has been fighting the Sabarimala case as well as enlightening the people about it described today’s action by the Supreme Court as “foot in the door“.

Subscribe to our newsletter

You will get all our latest news and articles via email when you subscribe

The email despatches will be non-commercial in nature
Disputes, if any, subject to jurisdiction in New Delhi

1 COMMENT

  1. I perfectly predicted in my FB post just one day before the ruling that SC will and can never reject the review petitions on #Sabarimala issue, when Muslims faith too involved in a similar entanglement. However I expected that SC will allow the review but CJI cleverly pushed the matter bf a CBench though not warranted.

Leave a Reply

Opinion

Trump Drives Democrats And Media Crazy

America can never be the same again, even after Trump leaves the White House,” say many, and you can read that anywhere

Balasaheb Thackeray’s Legacy Up For Grabs

The Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena has failed to live up to the ideals of Balasaheb, leaving a void that the BJP alone can fill

How BJP Pulled Off Maha Coup With Nobody Watching

As Devendra Fadnavis desisted from contradicting Uddhav Thackeray everyday, the media attention moved from the BJP to its noisy rivals

Anil Ambani: From Status Of Tycoon To Insolvency

Study the career of Anil Ambani, and you will get a classic case of decisions you ought not take as a businessman and time you better utilise

तवलीन सिंह, यह कैसा स्वाभिमान?

‘जिस मोदी सरकार का पांच साल सपोर्ट किया उसी ने मेरे बेटे को देश निकाला दे दिया,’ तवलीन सिंह ने लिखा। क्या आपने किसी क़ीमत के बदले समर्थन किया?
- Advertisement -

Elsewhere

Politicians, lawyers, journalists question Hyderabad ‘encounter’

While journalists condemned the encounter killing, some politicians exercised caution to avoid antagonising people who were cheering the cops

Sajjanar, Telangana’s ‘encounter’ pro, hails from Karnataka

His father is a native of the Asuti village of Ron taluka in the Gadag district, but Vishwanath C Sajjanar was born and brought up in Hubballi

Ajit Pawar exonerated under whose instructions?

Did ACB exonerate Ajit Pawar knowing that the regime would change on 28 November or they were clearing his name with Devendra Fadnavis's knowledge?

Family of raped, murdered vet hails Telangana Police

Not only the family of the veterinarian raped and murdered on 27 November but also those of the accused wanted them dead as soon as possible

Did Sajjanar plan the ‘encounter’ of rapists-killers?

In 2008, police in Warangal had similarly killed 3 students accused of an acid attack in an 'encounter' when Sajjanar used to be the area SP

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this:
Skip to toolbar