Why EC concluded PM Modi, Shah had not violated MCC

As per the model code of conduct, a candidate cannot seek votes in the name of religion, but when did Prime Minister Modi do that?

Editorials

ISRO Too Competent To Need Society’s Immature Reaction

Three days have passed since Lander Vikram strayed from the planned trajectory; the nation is still trying to motivate ISRO scientists as if they were in a state of despondency, notwithstanding their 95% success in meeting the Chandrayaan-2 mission objectives

Pandits’ Return Will Be Real Normalcy In Kashmir

The opposition and media would have the world believe that not persecuted Pandits getting their home and hearth back but terrorists conveniently using internet, bombs and bullets would qualify as normalcy in the Valley

Muslim Women Act Proves Modi Can If He Wants To

The passing of the Muslim Women Bill in the Rajya Sabha, which has established BJP's floor management prowess, must wake Hindus and the middle class up to pressure PM Narendra Modi to legislate what they have been demanding for ages

More reports

- Advertisement -

New Delhi: The Election Commission (EC) on Tuesday gave a clean chit to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on a complaint that had accused him of violating the model code of conduct (MCC) during the rally in Wardha of Maharashtra earlier this month. In that address, the prime miser had targeted Rahul Gandhi, without naming him, for contesting from Kerala’s Muslim-dominated Wayanad seat, besides his traditional seat in Uttar Pradesh’s Amethi where Hindus are the majority.

“Leaders of that party are now scared of contesting from constituencies dominated by majority (Hindu) population. That is why they are forced to take refuge in places where the majority is in a minority,” Modi had said, which prompted the Congress to complain about the prime minister before the EC and the Supreme Court.

The EC decision to declare the prime minister as ‘not guilty’ was unanimous. Sources said this was the entire commission’s first deliberation since 5 April on the alleged violation of the MCC.

Modi had raised another issue in Wardha on 1 April: “bhagva aatankwad” (saffron terror). “How can Congress be forgiven for insulting the Hindus in front of the world? Weren’t you hurt when you heard the word ‘Hindu terror’? How can a community known for peace, brotherhood and harmony be linked with terrorism? In the thousand years of history, not a single incident shows an act of Hindu terrorism. Even the British historians could never find it,” the prime minister had said.

Earlier in the day, the Supreme Court asked the commission to take a call on Modi’s speech in Wardha that the Congress complained about. The Congress sought action against BJP president Amit Shah for MCC violations too for alleged use of the armed forces for “political propaganda”.

A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, while giving the EC a free hand to pass orders on the complaint filed by Sushmita Dev, Congress Lok Sabha MP from Silchar in Assam and president of the All India Mahila Congress, said it would hear the matter on 2 May.

“It will be open for the EC to pass necessary/appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner. The matter will be heard on 2 May,” said the bench, which comprised also Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and KM Joseph. The apex court issued a notice to the poll panel, seeking its response to Dev’s plea.

Unlike the Congress, however, the Supreme Court does not believe the EC is partisan. Two weeks ago, the apex court had expressed satisfaction at the poll panel’s action against Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath, BSP supremo Mayawati, Union minister Maneka Gandhi, Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan, and others for allegedly saying things during the poll campaign that the MCC does not permit.

The petitioner had said that the Congress had verifiable evidence on the MCC violation by Modi and Shah. “The lack of decision despite cogent evidences (sic) and representations to the EC demonstrates abdication and indecision and a complete absence of justice, in ensuring a level playing field in ensuing Lok Sabha polls,” said Dev.

Sources say that the EC could take no action against the prime minister because he did not seek votes in the name of religion. They say Shah could not be warned, let alone blocked, either because members of the political executive can take credit for its policy decision to allow the defence forces, which otherwise function under the control of the civilian government, to take militarily wise actions against hostile countries.

For all reports related to the Lok Sabha election 2019, please visit this page.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Articles

BJP Could Not Have Won With This Approach To Delhi

From not paying attention to the corruption-ridden MCD to aloof leaders whose houses witnessed no activity during campaigns, BJP went all wrong in the Delhi assembly election

AAP Win In Delhi Was Foregone Conclusion: 5 Reasons

The five factors that contributed to the AAP victory have been arranged in the decreasing order of relevance; the first three will remain constant for a few more Delhi elections

Rahul Gandhi’s Intemperance Costs INC Dear Again

After forfeiting the Delhi poll with his 'danda mārenge' comment, the politician who has pledged never to grow up must put both his feet permanently in the mouth to gag himself

Bloomberg For US President? Why Not?

Mayor Michael Bloomberg can be an attractive candidate to a lot of voters – those who are concerned about the leftward, idiosyncratic, wokey, “let us butt into every other country’s internal policy initiatives” overreach of the Democrats

‘सभी संगठनों से मुक्त’ जामिया शूटर ‘बजरंग दल’ का कैसे हो गया?

जामिया क्षेत्र में गोली चलाने से पहले 'रामभक्त गोपाल' ने अपनी प्रोफ़ाइल बदली और धड़ल्ले से दक्षिणपंथी संगठनों व एक पार्टी के नाम दर्ज कर दिए

30 साल से ज़िन्दगी तलाशते कश्मीरी हिन्दू

मस्जिदों से हिन्दुओ के सफाए के पैगाम आए; एक के बाद एक दिल दहलाने वाली खबर आई; जुमे की नमाज़ के बाद सड़को पर जो भी हिन्दू दिखा, काट दिया गया

Pandits: 30 Years Since Being Ripped Apart

Pandits say, and rightly so, that their return to Kashmir cannot be pushed without ensuring a homeland for the Islam-ravaged community for conservation of their culture

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this: