Monday 27 June 2022
- Advertisement -

West Bengal chief secretary case set aside by SC

The Supreme Court has but granted Alapan Bandyopadhyay the liberty to assail the tribunal order before the jurisdictional high court

The Supreme Court today set aside a Calcutta High Court order that had stopped the of a case pertaining to disciplinary proceedings against former West Bengal Chief Secretary Alapan Bandyopadhyay from the state to Delhi. Now the hearing regarding the disciplinary proceeding against Bandyopadhyay will take place in the principal branch of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in Delhi.

However, a bench of Justices AM Khanwilkar and CT Ravikumar granted the former West Bengal chief secretary the liberty to assail the tribunal’s order before the jurisdictional high court.

The apex court delivered its verdict on a plea filed by the union government challenging the 29 October 2021, order of the high court.

On 29 November, the union government had taken “serious exception” to certain observations made by the high court in its order passed on a plea filed by the former West Bengal chief secretary who had challenged the proceedings initiated against him.

Bandyopadhyay had been issued a show-cause notice for allegedly abstaining from a held by Prime Minister in Kalaikunda last May. The union government had then initiated major penalty proceedings against the former West Bengal chief secretary for alleged misconduct and misbehaviour.

On 31 May 2021, the last day of Bandyopadhyay’s tenure as the then West Bengal chief secretary, he was directed to go to Delhi and report at North Block by 10 AM. He, however, took retirement that very day instead of going to Delhi.

Bandyopadhyay, who was made an adviser to West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee following his retirement, was then asked to reply to a “memorandum”, sent to him by the Department of Personnel and Training mentioning the charges, in 30 days.

Last November, the Supreme Court had reserved its judgment on the union government’s appeal against the order of the Calcutta High Court, which had stopped the of the case from the Calcutta bench of the central administrative tribunal to its principal bench in Delhi.

Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the union government, had contended that the Calcutta High Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the petition against the order passed by chairman of the tribunal in Delhi for transferring the case to the national capital.

Contribute to our cause

Contribute to the nation's cause

Sirf News needs to recruit journalists in large numbers to increase the volume of its reports and articles to at least 100 a day, which will make us mainstream, which is necessary to challenge the anti-India discourse by established media houses. Besides there are monthly liabilities like the subscription fees of news agencies, the cost of a dedicated server, office maintenance, marketing expenses, etc. Donation is our only source of income. Please serve the cause of the nation by donating generously.

Join Sirf News on

and/or

Latest video

Share via

Similar Articles

Comments

Scan to donate

Swadharma QR Code
Advertisment
Sirf News Facebook Page QR Code
Facebook page of Sirf News: Scan to like and follow

Most Popular

[prisna-google-website-translator]
%d bloggers like this: