-0.7 C
New York
Tuesday 30 November 2021

Buy now


HomePoliticsIndiaUNHRC moving Indian Supreme Court unacceptable: MEA

UNHRC moving Indian Supreme Court unacceptable: MEA

The MEA snubbed the UNHRC and said India was a democratic country which operated on the basis of law, which the Supreme Court would appreciate


The United Nations Human Rights Commission (UNHRC) filed a petition in the Supreme Court of India, alleging a pogrom, to which the Indian Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has responded, saying that no foreign party can interfere this way in India’s internal matters.

The Indian parliament-made Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) has moved the world the questionable way, as agencies shape their beliefs based on the leftist media propaganda over the happenings in India following the legislation. While opposition parties in India are opposing this law, some countries of the world have raised objections too with the misplaced notion it’s an anti-Muslim law.

The on Tuesday said this country’s mission in Geneva had received information on Monday that the UNHRC had filed a petition on the issue of the CAA in the Supreme Court. Foreign Ministry spokesman said the amendment of the law was an internal issue of India and that Sansad had the power to enact this law.

“We strongly believe that no foreign party has any locus standi on issues pertaining to India’s sovereignty,” said.

UNHRC moving Indian Supreme Court unacceptable, says MEA

The government said in its statement that the CAA fulfilled all the values ​​the Constitution of India upheld. It fulfils the promise made during the partition made years ago by the country regarding human rights, the statement said.

The said India was a democratic country which operated on the basis of law. “We all have (the) utmost respect for and full trust in our independent judiciary,” the MEA said and asserted that the Supreme Court would deliver the verdict in favour of the government.

Among the countries that have expressed concern over the CAA are an unsure United States but a cocksure and Pakistan. The has said in every statement that this was India’s internal matter and no external country should interfere in it.

Leftists and Muslims have moved the Supreme Court in hordes against the CAA. The Supreme Court is still hearing the cases.

Sirf News needs to recruit journalists in large numbers to increase the volume of its reports and articles to at least 100 a day, which will make us mainstream, which is necessary to challenge the anti-India discourse by established media houses. Besides there are monthly liabilities like the subscription fees of news agencies, the cost of a dedicated server, office maintenance, marketing expenses, etc. Donation is our only source of income. Please serve the cause of the nation by donating generously.

Support pro-India journalism by donating

via UPI to surajit.dasgupta@icici or

via PayTM to 9650444033

#BREAKING | July-Sept GDP expands 8.4% vs -7.4% YoY
July-Sept GVA expands 8.5% vs -7.3% YoY

#India #GDP #LIVE #Updates: https://bit.ly/3xEOe3n

করোনা পরিস্থিতির কারণে আদালতের বিচার প্রক্রিয়া চলছে হাইব্রিড মডেলে। অনেক মামলার শুনানিই চলছে অনলাইনে ভিডিয়ো কনফারেন্সের মাধ্যমে। আর তার মধ্যেই একেবারে অপ্রত্যাশিত এক ঘটনার সাক্ষী থাকল কর্নাটক হাইকোর্ট

#KarnatakaHighCourt | #TV9Bangla

The Delhi High Court declined to entertain a plea seeking a direction to the Central and #Delhi governments to ban the sale and publication of #Congress leader Salman Khurshid’s latest book.

देखें, उन देशों की लिस्ट जहां मिल चुके हैं नए कोविड -19 संस्करण के मामले

#OmicronVariant #National


Read further:

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

- Advertisment -



%d bloggers like this: