17.1 C
New Delhi
Friday 24 January 2020

Two Indian-origin men charged with securities and wire fraud in US

Two Indian-origin men have been charged by federal authorities in the US with securities and wire fraud for inflating the value of private funds they advised by hundreds of millions of dollars

New York City: Two Indian-origin men have been charged by federal authorities in the US with securities and wire fraud for inflating the value of private funds they advised by hundreds of millions of dollars.

Anilesh Ahuja, 49, of New York, the founder, chief executive officer, and chief investment officer of a New York-based investment firm that managed hedge funds focused on structured credit products, was arrested on Wednesday, Audrey Strauss, the Attorney for the United States said.

In addition, Strauss announced the unsealing of charges against Ashish Dole, a former chief risk officer and trader at the firm, and Frank Dinucci, a former salesman at a broker-dealer.

Dole, 34, of White Plains had pleaded guilty last November to one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud and wire fraud and one count of securities fraud. Dinucci has also pled guilty and is cooperating with the government.

Charges were also filed against Amin Majidi, a former partner and portfolio manager at the firm and Jeremy Shor, a former trader.

Ahuja, Majidi 52, and Shor, 46 are charged with participating in a scheme, from in or about 2014 through 2016, to commit securities fraud and wire fraud relating to the mismarking of certain securities held in hedge funds that the firm managed, thus fraudulently inflating the net asset value of those funds as reported to investors and potential investors.

At its peak, the mismarking across all funds managed by the firm exceeded $200 million.

The charges carry up to 25 years in prison and a maximum fine of $5 million.

“Investors rely on a hedge fund’s performance numbers when deciding whom to trust with their capital. To compete with other peer funds, Neil Ahuja, founder of an investment firm, allegedly manipulated the firm’s performance numbers, using fraudulently inflated values for the firm’s securities holdings and lying to investors about how the firm would mark its positions,” Strauss said.

She added that by allegedly cooking the books, Ahuja and his co-defendants made the fund appear more attractive to would-be investors and dissuaded current investors from withdrawing their investments.

In a separate action, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed civil charges against Ahuja, Majidi, and Shor.

According to the allegations in the charging documents, from at about 2014 through 2016, Ahuja, Majidi, Shor and others, including Dole and Dinucci participated in a scheme to defraud the firm’s investors and potential investors by deceptively mismarking each month the value of certain securities held in various funds, fraudulently inflating the net asset value of those funds as reported to investors and potential investors. At times, the net asset value was overstated by more than $200 million across the funds managed by the firm.

The mismarking scheme evolved as a result of demands by Ahuja and Majidi that the firm maintains its track record of success and keep pace with the performance of peer funds, regardless of market conditions or the actual performance of the funds.

Stay on top - Get daily news in your email inbox

Sirf Views

Pandits: 30 Years Since Being Ripped Apart

Pandits say, and rightly so, that their return to Kashmir cannot be pushed without ensuring a homeland for the Islam-ravaged community for conservation of their culture

Fear-Mongering In The Times Of CAA

No one lived in this country with so much fear before,” asserted a friend while dealing with India's newly amended citizenship...

CAA: Never Let A Good Crisis Go To Waste

So said Winston Churchill, a lesson for sure for Prime Miniter Narendra Modi who will use the opposition's calumny over CAA to his advantage

Archbishop Of Bangalore Spreading Canards About CAA

The letter of Archbishop Peter Machado to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, published in The Indian Express, is ridden with factual inaccuracies

Sabarimala: Why Even 7 Judges Weren’t Deemed Enough

For an answer, the reader will have to go through a history of cases similar to the Sabarimala dispute heard in the Supreme Court

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this: