17.1 C
New Delhi
Thursday 23 January 2020

Trump hardens stand on China; doubles down on ‘reciprocal tax’

Trump also pitched for the "reciprocal tax" programme, which, he says, would ensure "fair trade deals" for the US

Washington: As he signed orders imposing stiff and sweeping new tariffs on imported steel and aluminium, US President Donald Trump today appeared to be hardening his stance on China, with which America has an annual trade deficit of nearly $500 billion.

Trump also pitched for the “reciprocal tax” programme, which, he says, would ensure “fair trade deals” for the US. Trump doesn’t hesitate to name India while talking about the reciprocal tax.

The US President mentioned China several times in his speech in the Roosevelt Room of the White House at a ceremony wherein he signed two proclamations to impose 25% and 10% import duties on steel and aluminium respectively.

“China says it’s got 2%, but it sends much more. We’re going to have a great relationship, hopefully, with China, but we have to do something. We’re losing with China $500 billion a year. We have to do something,” Trump told reporters during the signing ceremony.

Trump said the US is going to stop the trans-shipping.

“Well, we’ll let it happen, but they’ve got to pay. So trans-shipping, frankly, is a big deal,” he said.

“And they trans-ship, and we’re going to accept their product, but it’s going to cost a lot of money from the standpoint of the trans-shipper,” he added.

The US, he said, is negotiating now with China.

“We’re in the midst of a big negotiation. I don’t know that anything is going to come of it. They have been very helpful. President Xi, I have great respect for. A lot of respect,” he said.

“But we’re going to cut down the deficits one way or the other. We have a deficit with China of at least $500 billion. When you add an intellectual property, it’s much higher than that,” Trump said.

He then referred to a tweet from Tesla chief Elan Musk.

“Very interesting, I saw a tweet, just came in from Elon Musk who’s using our wonderful space facilities and did a great job three weeks ago. He said, ‘For example, an American car going to China pays 25% import duty. But a Chinese car coming to the United States only pays 2.5%. A tenfold difference’,” the US President said.

“So an American car going to China pays 25% import duty. We send our car over there, pay 25%. They send their car over here, 2.5%. Ten points. But everybody knows it, they’ve known it for years. They never did anything about it. It’s got to change,” Trump said as he once again raked up the issue of high import duty on Harley-Davidson motorcycles by India.

“We’re going to be doing a reciprocal tax program at some point, so that if China’s going to charge us 25% or if India’s going to charge us 75%, and we charge them nothing. If they’re at 50 or they’re at 75 or they’re at 25, we’re going to beat those same numbers,” he said.

“So, they charge us 50, we charge them 50. Right now, they’ll charge us 50, we charge them nothing. Doesn’t work. So that’s called a “reciprocal tax,” or “mirror tax.” And we’re going to be doing a lot of that,” he added.

China, which ranks 11 among the largest sources of US steel imports, cautioned yesterday that it was prepared to “make an appropriate and necessary response” should the United States impose the tariffs.

PTI

Stay on top - Get daily news in your email inbox

Sirf Views

Pandits: 30 Years Since Being Ripped Apart

Pandits say, and rightly so, that their return to Kashmir cannot be pushed without ensuring a homeland for the Islam-ravaged community for conservation of their culture

Fear-Mongering In The Times Of CAA

No one lived in this country with so much fear before,” asserted a friend while dealing with India's newly amended citizenship...

CAA: Never Let A Good Crisis Go To Waste

So said Winston Churchill, a lesson for sure for Prime Miniter Narendra Modi who will use the opposition's calumny over CAA to his advantage

Archbishop Of Bangalore Spreading Canards About CAA

The letter of Archbishop Peter Machado to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, published in The Indian Express, is ridden with factual inaccuracies

Sabarimala: Why Even 7 Judges Weren’t Deemed Enough

For an answer, the reader will have to go through a history of cases similar to the Sabarimala dispute heard in the Supreme Court

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this: