Washington, DC: In the morning of 16 May, United States President Donald Trump defended his disclosure of classified information regarding the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL or ISIS) to Russian foreign minister and ambassador , a decision that has drawn a storm of both explanation and criticism from the media and both major US political parties over the past week.
|As president, I wanted to share with Russia [at an openly scheduled (White House) meeting], which I have the absolute right to do.|
|—U.S. President Donald Trump on Twitter|
Trump spoke directly to the public, as is his custom, via Twitter.
On 10 May, President Trump had met with Lavrov and Kislyak in the and, according to reports first from the Washington Post, told them about an Islamic State plot to sneak explosives onto aeroplanes by hiding them in laptop computers. This may have placed the anonymous partner who provided it in danger of identification. According to US officials, the information in question was so sensitive that it is not only usually not shared with allies but also extremely restricted even within the US government.
“The Russians have the widest intelligence collection mechanism in the world outside of our own,” said Central Intelligence Agency‘s Russia division. “They can put together a good picture with just a few details[…] They can marry President Trump’s comments with their own intelligence, and intelligence from their allies. They can also deploy additional resources to find out details.”, the former head of the US
While it is not illegal for the sitting US president to share classified information with foreign officials, it may violate the agreement with the person or organisation who provided the information in the first place. There are concerns the Russians may reverse-engineer the process by which the information was gathered and identify the source. Because many of the countries in the Middle East have tribal-level connections to areas controlled by the Islamic State, allowing a source to be identified could place them in political as well as personal danger. An official from one country in Europe told the Associated Press his government might cease to share intelligence with the United States. According to US officials who spoke on condition of anonymity, the information came from Israel. None of their Israeli counterparts has seen fit to either confirm or deny this, and Israeli ambassador to the US wrote to The New York Times expressing “full confidence” in the US intelligence process.
Trump’s advisors who were present at the meeting were quick to say on Monday, once the disclosure was reported publicly, that Trump did not tell the Russians exactly how the US had come by any information. “At no time — at no time — were intelligence sources or methods discussed, and the president did not disclose any military operations that were not already publicly known,” said Trump’s National Security Advisor, Lieutenant General , who also told reporters, “I was in the room. It didn’t happen.” No US newspapers were invited to the meeting.
, a spokesperson for the Russian foreign ministry, said the report of Trump disclosing classified material was “another fake.”
Republican Senator of Tennessee, noting he was not present at the meeting and did not personally know if President Trump actually compromised the source, said, “To compromise a source is something that you just don’t do, and that’s why we keep the information that we get from intelligence sources so close as to prevent that from happening.”
Senator Rhode Island, who serves on the US , and fellow Democrat Adam Schiff of the both raised concerns about Trump’s mindfulness. Reed called it “reckless” and said: “The president of the United States has the power to share classified information with whomever (sic) they wish, but the American people expect the president to use that power wisely. I don’t believe the president intentionally meant to reveal highly secretive information to the Russians.”of
Trump’s meeting with the Russian ministers took place one day after he fired Federal Bureau of Investigation director , who had been running an investigation into alleged Russian involvement in the 2016 US presidential election, which raised concerns about obstruction of justice.
From Wikinews under Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 licence