Sunday 26 June 2022
- Advertisement -

Supreme Court uncomfortable with Delhi HC’s bail order?

Reading down of the UAPA may have pan-India ramifications, the Supreme Court observed, notwithstanding its refusal to stay the HC bail order

Whereas the Supreme Court might have refused to stay the bail order of the Delhi High Court yesterday, today it did not sound comfortable with the idea. Reading down of anti-terror law is an important issue and may have -India ramifications, the Supreme Court observed today as it sought responses from three Pinjra Tod activists who had been granted by the Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi riots conspiracy.

While upholding the Delhi High Court verdict granting to the activists, the Supreme Court had said even yesterday that “it will not be treated as a precedent and not relied upon by the parties before any court.’’

A bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and V Ramasubramanian made it clear that the bails granted to these student activists — Natasha Narwal, Devangana Kalita and Jamia student Asif Iqbal Tanha — will not be affected for the time being.

The bench took note also of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta’s submission that the Delhi High Court had turned the anti-terror law UAPA upside down while granting to these activists. The bench said what was troubling was that 100 pages of the verdict had been rendered while granting bail and the judgment discussed the entire law. A 2019 verdict by the apex court had posited that scrutiny of the applicability of the UAPA was not permissible at the stage when an accused seeks bail.

The Supreme Court made these observations while hearing the special leave petitions filed by the Delhi Police against the granted by the Delhi High Court to the Pinjra Tod activists and students Devangana Kalita, Natasha Narwal, and Asif Iqbal Tanha.

These activists will stay out of jail, the Supreme Court said as it upheld Tuesday’s Delhi High Court order granting them bail.

The Supreme Court also agreed to examine the legal aspects of the Delhi High Court verdict and said the case would be taken up next month.

All the three arrested in May last year for alleged instigation to riots that erupted in Delhi in February 2020 amid tension over protests against the citizenship law were given Tuesday on personal bonds of Rs 50,000 each and two sureties of a similar amount.

On Wednesday Delhi Police had moved the Supreme Court asking for a stay on the order. The police had said that the high court’s findings were “perverse and contrary to record” and appeared to be based “more on the social narrative”.

Contribute to our cause

Contribute to the nation's cause

Sirf News needs to recruit journalists in large numbers to increase the volume of its reports and articles to at least 100 a day, which will make us mainstream, which is necessary to challenge the anti-India discourse by established media houses. Besides there are monthly liabilities like the subscription fees of news agencies, the cost of a dedicated server, office maintenance, marketing expenses, etc. Donation is our only source of income. Please serve the cause of the nation by donating generously.

Join Sirf News on

and/or

Latest video

Share via

Similar Articles

Comments

Scan to donate

Swadharma QR Code
Advertisment
Sirf News Facebook Page QR Code
Facebook page of Sirf News: Scan to like and follow

Most Popular

[prisna-google-website-translator]
%d bloggers like this: