Tuesday 19 October 2021
- Advertisement -
HomeCrimeSupreme Court quashes MP HC's 'rakhi for bail of molester' order

Supreme Court quashes MP HC’s ‘rakhi for bail of molester’ order

The Supreme Court bench headed by Justice AM Khanwilkar, while quashing the order, issued a slew of directions to educate lower court judges


The Supreme Court today quashed the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s order that had granted bail to a man accused in a molestation case on an anachronistic condition that he would tie ‘rakhi‘ to the victim (practically, considering her his sister). In view of the awkward ruling, the Supreme Court bench headed by Justice AM Khanwilkar issued a slew of directions like training modules for sensitisation of judges and emphasized that judges should avoid any kind of stereotyping.

This is not the first time that the highest court of the had to think of measures to educate judges of high or lower courts. Besides other instances, the Supreme Court Collegium in January this year had withdrawn its recommendation to appoint Justice Pushpa V Ganediwala, the additional judge of the Bombay who had issued a strange verdict about groping, as a permanent judge of the court.

Attorney General (AG) KK Venugopal had opposed the bail condition advised by the Madhya Pradesh High Court.

Advocate Aparna Bhat and eight other women lawyers had filed this plea against the 30 July order by the Madhya Pradesh that had asked a victim to tie a rakhi on the accused, which, the had said, would make the offender fit for bail!

“The bail condition in question amounts to further victimisation of the survivor in her own house. In the context of ‘Raksha Bandhan’ being a festival of guardianship between brothers and sisters, the said bail condition amounts to gross trivialization of the trauma suffered by the complainant in the present case”, said the plea.

The petitioners had argued that the bail condition by the should be set aside.

Bhat had contended in the plea that order has been passed by a constitutional court such as a of a state and there is a strong likelihood that such observations and directions may result in normalizing “what is essentially a and has been recognised to be so by the law.”

The plea said: “It is highly objectionable for the in the present case to put the complainant in a position where she is forced to accept the sum of Rs 11,000 as part of the customary of Raksha Bandhan. Moreover, the said bail condition also goes a step further by stating that Respondent No. 2 (the accused) tender Rs 5,000 to the son the complainant.”

Sirf News needs to recruit journalists in large numbers to increase the volume of its reports and articles to at least 100 a day, which will make us mainstream, which is necessary to challenge the anti-India discourse by established media houses. Besides there are monthly liabilities like the subscription fees of news agencies, the cost of a dedicated server, office maintenance, marketing expenses, etc. Donation is our only source of income. Please serve the cause of the nation by donating generously.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

- Advertisment -