15.1 C
New Delhi
Wednesday 22 January 2020

‘Stop Trump-bashing; blame flawed Nehruvian foreign policy’

Lawyer Amitabh Sinha says Jawaharlal Nehru's wrong and short-sighted choice of a global partner post-Independence had pushed the US towards Pakistan that cultivated its lobby in that country which makes the POTUS attempt balancing acts even as he draws closer to India

Washington, DC; New Delhi: US President Donald Trump has once again rectified his position. He has said the issue of Kashmir is a bilateral matter between India and Pakistan but he would be happy to mediate if the two countries wanted him to do so. “It’s really up to Prime Minister (Narendra) Modi (to accept the offer of mediation),” Trump told reporters responding to a question on India not accepting his offer of mediation on Kashmir.

On the previous occasion, White House had to issue a clarification while a Member of the House of Representatives claimed that he had apologised to the Indian Ambassador in Washington, DC. Last week, Trump had made a stunning claim that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had asked him to mediate on the vexed issue during their meeting in Japan, evoking a sharp reaction from India which denied Modi making any such request.

Addressing the issue of two similar comments of the POTUS that made certain forces here that are uncomfortable with the warmth in India-US relations clamour for a strongly worded Indian response, lawyer and nationalist thinker Amitabh Sinha said. “Jawaharlal Nehru’s wrong and short-sighted choice of a reliable partner out of the two superpowers post-Independence had pushed the United States towards Pakistan. Our hostile neighbour seized the opportunity and, all these years, built and cultivated their lobby in America,” he said, adding that India was a late starter in developing its interests on the American soil.

“If President Trump has made the statement of mediation twice in a short span,” Sinha said, “look at it as a demand of American politics. He is doing a balancing act before the pro-Pakistan, anti-India lobby that is disturbed by a clear shift in the American foreign policy that now favours India.”

While Trump’s comments are seen as an apparent climbdown from his last week’s remarks which were dismissed in India as ridiculous and highly unlikely given that New Delhi has consistently maintained that there is no room for a third party mediation on Kashmir, Sinha says, “Since our bilateral relations have improved remarkably, he is quick to be back in his elements and tow the Indian line of no third party intervention on the Kashmir issue.”

“Besides,” Sinha says, “Trump did not compel us. He just made an offer.” Before Trump had on Thursday rued that the issue of Kashmir had been going on for a long time, he was actually asked how he would “want to resolve the Kashmir issue”. It was then that Trump had said, “If I can, if they wanted me to, I would certainly intervene.” Sinha recalled that Trump had spoken when prodded to.

“This is clearly a difficult balancing act between humouring the Pakistani lobby in the US but being wary of inviting the ire of its new NATO-like ally in the world order,” Sinha said in reference to the US Senate’s 2 July legislative provision that brought India at par with America’s NATO allies and countries like Israel and South Korea for increasing defence cooperation.

“There are forces across the world and even in India, who are directly or indirectly supporters of jihadi terrorism, that do not like our country and the United States draw close. They would try all out to discredit Trump create an impression he is bossy, but we should not shower a bevvy of condemnations in a knee-jerk reaction to these statements,” Sinha said.

Sinha said. “Trump is an enemy of terrorism; he is fighting Islamic terrorism, which makes him India’s friend,” the lawyer said, adding, “No matter what the POTUS has said under whatever situation, he just cannot side with Pakistan, a state that sponsors terrorists.”

Surajit Dasgupta
Surajit Dasgupta
The founder of सिर्फ़ News has been a science correspondent in The Statesman, senior editor in The Pioneer, special correspondent in Money Life and columnist in various newspapers and magazines, writing in English as well as Hindi. He was the national affairs editor of Swarajya, 2014-16. He worked with Hindusthan Samachar in 2017. He was the first chief editor of Sirf News and is now back at the helm after a stint as the desk head of MyNation of the Asianet group. He is a mathematician by training with interests in academic pursuits of science, linguistics and history. He advocates individual liberty and a free market in a manner that is politically feasible. His hobbies include Hindi film music and classical poetry in Bengali, English, French, Hindi and Urdu.

Stay on top - Get daily news in your email inbox

Sirf Views

Pandits: 30 Years Since Being Ripped Apart

Pandits say, and rightly so, that their return to Kashmir cannot be pushed without ensuring a homeland for the Islam-ravaged community for conservation of their culture

Fear-Mongering In The Times Of CAA

No one lived in this country with so much fear before,” asserted a friend while dealing with India's newly amended citizenship...

CAA: Never Let A Good Crisis Go To Waste

So said Winston Churchill, a lesson for sure for Prime Miniter Narendra Modi who will use the opposition's calumny over CAA to his advantage

Archbishop Of Bangalore Spreading Canards About CAA

The letter of Archbishop Peter Machado to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, published in The Indian Express, is ridden with factual inaccuracies

Sabarimala: Why Even 7 Judges Weren’t Deemed Enough

For an answer, the reader will have to go through a history of cases similar to the Sabarimala dispute heard in the Supreme Court

Related Stories

1 COMMENT

Leave a Reply

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this: