19.3 C
New Delhi
Wednesday 29 January 2020

SPG Amendment Bill, 2019: How different from 1988 law

Now, after the withdrawal of SPG security from a former prime minister, the withdrawal of SPG from his/her family members would be mandatory

On 25 November (today), Union Home Minister Amit Shah introduced the Special Protection Group (Amendment) Bill, 2019, in the Lok Sabha. The bill has been brought for amendment in the SPG Act, 1988. The law prescribes SPG protection as a rule to the prime minister, former prime ministers and their very close family members.

Old SPG law

The old law states that if this security is withdrawn from a former prime minister, the SPG will not remain with the family members either, provided that the family members do not face the risk of the level for which SPG security is required.

Proposed change in SPG law

Limited security for family

Under this law, the SPG provides protection to the prime minister and his very close family members. When the prime minister quits, his very close family members get the cover for just one year from the day he leaves his post. After one year of his removal from the post, this level of security is given to him alone, depending on the extent of the threat perception.

The Union government decides the level of security needed by the protected. The government takes this decision on two parameters: first, the subject faces a risk to his life from a military or terrorist organisation and, second, the threat is of a very serious and persistent nature.

5-year term for family

The amendment bill states that SPG security will be given to prime ministers and their family members who live in the PM’s residence with him/her.

The bill proposes further that former Prime Ministers and his/her family members living with him/her in the government accommodation allotted to them will continue to receive this kind of protection for five years from the day the subject leaves the prime minister’s post.

New provision

Now, this condition has been lifted. After the withdrawal of SPG security from former prime ministers, the withdrawal of this protection from their family members would be mandatory.

Shah says

Union Home Minister Amit Shah said that under the amendment he has brought, SPG protection will be only for the prime minister and those living in his residence with him and former prime ministers and their families living in government-allotted houses will get this protection for a period of 5 years.

During his presentation in the Rajya Sabha, some Congress MPs raised the issue of downgrading of protection to the Nehru-Gandhi family and accused the government of making a “vindictive effort” to harass their first family. Shah responded, saying, “‘Vindictive effort’ is not the culture of my party. Congress party on several occasions hurt the country by its ‘vindictive efforts’.”

Stay on top - Get daily news in your email inbox

Sirf Views

Soros Loves To Play Messiah To The Miserable

The opportunity to throw breadcrumbs massages the ego of NGOs supremacists run; the megalomaniac Soros is a personification of that ego

Pandits: 30 Years Since Being Ripped Apart

Pandits say, and rightly so, that their return to Kashmir cannot be pushed without ensuring a homeland for the Islam-ravaged community for conservation of their culture

Fear-Mongering In The Times Of CAA

No one lived in this country with so much fear before,” asserted a friend while dealing with India's newly amended citizenship...

CAA: Never Let A Good Crisis Go To Waste

So said Winston Churchill, a lesson for sure for Prime Miniter Narendra Modi who will use the opposition's calumny over CAA to his advantage

Archbishop Of Bangalore Spreading Canards About CAA

The letter of Archbishop Peter Machado to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, published in The Indian Express, is ridden with factual inaccuracies

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this: