Saturday 31 July 2021
- Advertisement -

SPG Act will inconvenience Modi ji alone: Shah

Reacting to the INC MPs' protest against the amended SPG Act, the home minister wondered why nobody had protested when the security cover of families of former prime ministers other than Rajiv Gandhi had been downgraded

During the preceding the passing of the SPG Amendment Bill in the Rajya Sabha on Tuesday, Union Home Minister Amit Shah quipped that the only person who would be inconvenienced by the changed law was current Prime Minister Narendra Modi, as he would be stripped of the facility five years later. Shah also said during the debate, addressing the discomfort of INC MPs who had been protesting against the lower-level security for Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi-Vadra, that the government was against dynasties, not families. The context for that was the fact that the amended law does not offer the highest level of security to the members of a former prime minister’s family, which the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty has been enjoying because Rajiv Gandhi was once the prime minister of the country.

Amit Shah said that the security provided by the state could never be a status .

The Union home minister said if anyone were to be harmed by the new SPG law, it would be Prime Minister Modi. “Because after five years his SPG security cover will go away,” Shah said, pointing out that “the security of Chandrashekhar ji, VP Singh ji, Narasimha Rao ji, IK Gujral ji and ji has been changed to Z plus, too.” The home minister said he wondered why the INC MPs did not protest when the security covers of these former prime ministers (including those from their party) and their families were downgraded.

Earlier, in the Rajya Sabha, starting the discussion on the SPG Act Amendment Bill, INC’s Vivek Tankha said that this bill smacked of politics whereas the issue of security must be beyond a partisan approach.

Tankha said that the SPG had been formed after the assassination of Indira Gandhi in 1984. When the law was enacted, he said, the then Prime Minister (Rajiv Gandhi) and his family were brought under its protection. “The government changed in 1989. Everyone knew that Rajiv Gandhi’s life was in danger. The government was requested for their . Rajiv Gandhi was eventually assassinated in 1991. The country lost young leadership.”

In fact, Shah had responded to the issue raised by Tankha when similar questions were raised in the Lok Sabha.

To serve the nation better through journalism, Sirf News needs to increase the volume of news and views, for which we must recruit many journalists, pay news agencies and make a dedicated server host this website — to mention the most visible costs. Please contribute to preserve and promote our civilisation by donating generously:

Related Articles

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Stay Connected

- Advertisement -

Latest Articles

Translate »
%d bloggers like this: