Shiv Sena’s blackmail continues; BJP wouldn’t react as of now

A section in the BJP wants to snub the Shiv Sena after 30 October as it feels a part of the demands of the latter are unacceptable while the open show of pressure tactic is unseemly

Must read

त्राहिमाम करते टेलिकॉम उद्योग ने बढ़ाया शुल्क, भाग गए ग्राहक

सबसे ज़्यादा नुकसान वोडाफ़ोन-आइडिया को हुआ जिसने टेलिकॉम बाज़ार में ३६ लाख से अधिक ग्राहक खो दिए; एयरटेल और यहाँ तक कि जिओ को भी क्षति पहुँची है
- Advertisement -

Continuing with its act of arm-twisting the bigger NDA ally BJP, the Shiv Sena said on Sunday that the “remote control of power” in Maharashtra was now in the hands of party chief Uddhav Thackeray. The party has the gall to say this despite securing fewer seats in the Assembly this time than in 2014, a poorer strike rate and just about 50% of the number of seats the BJP has won.

During the first Shiv Sena-BJP coalition government in the state from 1995 to 1999, the late Bal Thackeray, the founder of Shiv Sena, used the term “remote control” often; in media commentary, too, the term was used while describing the real status of whoever Balasaheb chose to make the chief minister. The Shiv Sena, along with their other demands, wants the BJP to give an assurance in writing that they will share power “equally”, which would include the larger partner’s assurance that there will be two chief ministers in the coming five years, one from the BJP and the other from the Sena, with each occupying the chair for two-and-a-half years.

In his column “Rok Tok” in the Sena mouthpiece Saamana, Sanjay Raut has written, “Shiv Sena has won fewer seats this time. It has won 56 seats compared to 63 in 2014, but it holds the key to power.”

The Shiv Sena on Saturday had sought an assurance from its ally BJP in writing that it would implement the “equal share of power formula” (50:50) in Maharashtra. Fishing in the troubled waters, the Congress has said that the Uddhav Thackeray-led party should find an “alternative system”.

The newly elected Shiv Sena MLAs met party president Uddhav Thackeray at his residence in Mumbai. He demanded that his son and Yuva Sena chief Aditya Thackeray be made the chief minister. This is the third day of relentless pressure exerted by the Sena on its pre-poll ally since the day the regional party was known to have won 56 seats while the BJP won 105 in the Maharashtra Assembly election held on 21 October, the result of which was declared on 24 October.

The MLAs authorised the Shiv Sena chief to take a decision regarding the formation of the new government. A Shiv Sena MLA said, “Uddhav Thackeray has said that he has other options open. But he is not interested in finding them because BJP and Shiv Sena are tied to each other through the ideology of Hindutva.”

BJP not to react to Shiv Sena’s blackmail until…

Meanwhile, Maharashtra Pradesh BJP chief Chandrakant Patil, when asked about the much-reported demand by the Shiv Sena for the post of chief minister for two and a half years, simply said, “Everyone has the right to express views.”

Elected from Kothrud seat in Pune city, Patil said that the final decision on government formation would be taken by Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis and Shiv Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray. He told reporters that the newly-elected BJP MLAs would meet in Mumbai on 30 October to elect the leader of the BJP legislative party.

A source in the national leadership of the BJP told Sirf News that accepting the condition of making Aaditya Thackeray the chief minister was out of the question but added that “some arrangement will be worked out” after the legislative party meeting.

To put counter-pressure on the Shiv Sena, the BJP may go to the extent of telling its junior partner it is ready to stay out of power, said sources. A section in the party thinks if the present imbroglio does not end on or after 30 October, it could lead to a Karnataka-like situation in Maharashtra after which a mid-term poll will have to be called if the BJP refuses to form a minority government with its present tally. Then, the party could go it all alone, repeating the 2014 numbers or even surpassing it, a senior politician said.

Seeking assurances in the written form is being seen as Shiv Sena’s way to pressure the larger partner. The BJP has lost 17 seats in this election compared to 2014 and its number of seats has come down from 122 in 2014 to 105. Nevertheless, it is the first time the BJP managed to secure at least the position of the single-largest party after five years of incumbency for the first time in Maharashtra.

According to political analysts, the BJP’s poor performance has increased Shiv Sena’s bargaining power. However, the number of seats of Shiv Sena has also come down from 63 in 2014 to 56 now.

On Thursday, the Shiv Sena had begun the blackmail by reminding the BJP of the “50: 50 formula”, which was allegedly agreed upon between BJP president Amit Shah, Thackeray and Fadnavis ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha election. According to sources, by this formula, Shiv Sena and BJP will have chief ministers on a cyclical basis and both parties will get an equal number of berths in the Cabinet. Thackeray had said, “We (Shiv Sena) contested fewer seats in Lok Sabha and Assembly elections. I cannot make room for the BJP every time. I want to remind the BJP of the formula that was made in the presence of Amit Shah.”

- Advertisement -

More reports

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

- Advertisement -

Latest views pieces

BJP Could Not Have Won With This Approach To Delhi

From not paying attention to the corruption-ridden MCD to aloof leaders whose houses witnessed no activity during campaigns, BJP went all wrong in the Delhi assembly election

AAP Win In Delhi Was Foregone Conclusion: 5 Reasons

The five factors that contributed to the AAP victory have been arranged in the decreasing order of relevance; the first three will remain constant for a few more Delhi elections

Rahul Gandhi’s Intemperance Costs INC Dear Again

After forfeiting the Delhi poll with his 'danda mārenge' comment, the politician who has pledged never to grow up must put both his feet permanently in the mouth to gag himself

Bloomberg For US President? Why Not?

Mayor Michael Bloomberg can be an attractive candidate to a lot of voters – those who are concerned about the leftward, idiosyncratic, wokey, “let us butt into every other country’s internal policy initiatives” overreach of the Democrats

‘सभी संगठनों से मुक्त’ जामिया शूटर ‘बजरंग दल’ का कैसे हो गया?

जामिया क्षेत्र में गोली चलाने से पहले 'रामभक्त गोपाल' ने अपनी प्रोफ़ाइल बदली और धड़ल्ले से दक्षिणपंथी संगठनों व एक पार्टी के नाम दर्ज कर दिए

30 साल से ज़िन्दगी तलाशते कश्मीरी हिन्दू

मस्जिदों से हिन्दुओ के सफाए के पैगाम आए; एक के बाद एक दिल दहलाने वाली खबर आई; जुमे की नमाज़ के बाद सड़को पर जो भी हिन्दू दिखा, काट दिया गया

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this: