15 C
New Delhi
Wednesday 13 November 2019
India Shia contention dismissed by SC: Here's why

Shia contention dismissed by SC: Here’s why

The Shia party to the Ayodhya dispute had based its case on the identity of Mir Baqi, Mughal conqueror Babur's general, who built Babri Masjid

-

- Advertisment -

Subscribe to our newsletter

You will get all our latest news and articles via email when you subscribe

The email despatches will be non-commercial in nature
Disputes, if any, subject to jurisdiction in New Delhi

The five-judge constitutional bench of the Supreme Court headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi dismissed the Shia Waqf Board’s plea while passing the judgment in the Ayodhya case today. Before the verdict, Shia Waqf Board counsel Ashwani Upadhyay had said that Mughal conqueror Babur’s general Mir Baqi was a Shia and that no Shia-made mosque could be given to a Sunni. “Therefore, we have the right over it and it should be given to us,” the Shia party to the dispute held.

The Shia Waqf Board demanded the land to transfer it to Hindus so that they could build a grand temple of the god Allama Iqbal referred to as Imam-e-Hind: Lord Rama. The side held that it would set an example of Hindu-Muslim unity.

On behalf of the sect’s waqf board, chairman Syed Wasim Rizvi said that the Babri Masjid was under the Shia Waqf, based on available evidence. It said it was a different matter altogether that in the last 71 years, the Babri structure had not been claimed by the Shia Waqf Board. He said that the Waqf Masjid Mir Baqi was a Muslim property under the jurisdiction of the Shia Waqf.

The Shia Waqf Board has been openly saying that a temple should be built at the disputed site. Wasim Rizvi said that if both the temple and the mosque were to be built at the disputed site, there would be a possibility of conflict between the communities. This should be avoided, Rizvi held. For this, a Ram temple should be constructed at the disputed place and a mosque should be constructed in the Muslim-dominated area left far from the disputed place.

Rizvi said that the board he headed used to hold the disputed land till 1946 and there used to be Shia’s Mutawalli, but the British government transferred the land to the Sunni Waqf Board. The board said that Mir Baqi, who built the Babri Masjid, was a Shia. “That is why it becomes our first right,” Rizvi had argued.

The matter began to be heard daily in the Supreme Court, beginning 6 August and the process ended on 16 October. In the Supreme Court, a five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi reserved the verdict then and delivered the judgment today. The bench consisted of Justice Bobde, Justice Dhananjay Y Chandrachud, Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice S Abdul Nazeer.

Dismissing the Shia contention, the Supreme Court ruled that the land belonged to the government as of now as per the revenue records and, therefore, the argument above could not be upheld.

The court also dismissed the petition filed by the Nirmohi Akhara which had moved the trial court in 1959 seeking management and devotee rights over the land.

Fourteen appeals had been filed in the apex court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment, delivered in four civil suits. It said the 2.77-acre land in Ayodhya be partitioned equally among the three parties: the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.

Leave a Reply

Opinion

Guru Nanak Jayanti: What First Sikh Guru Taught

While Guru Nanak urged people to 'nām japo, kirat karo, vand chhako', he stood for several values while he also fought various social evils

Muhammed Who Inconvenienced Muslims

Archaeologist KK Muhammed had earlier got on the nerves of the leftist intelligentsia for exposing their nexus with Islamic extremists

UCC Now, Rajnath Hints: Here’s How Modi Can Do It

Modi can argue in a manner to make UCC look secular and pro-Hindu at the same time, making a Muslim or Christian counterargument impossible

Tulasi: Two Stories, One Reason For Devotion

The Padma Purana, Devi Bhagavatam and Skanda Purana tell the story of Tulasi or Vrinda differently but the essence of devotion is a constant

BJP Cannot Afford Ideological Confusion

Being everything to everybody is Congress, which now faces doom. Socialism, secularism and 'sabka vishwas' are pushing BJP down the same path.
- Advertisement -

Elsewhere

Guru Nanak Jayanti: What First Sikh Guru Taught

While Guru Nanak urged people to 'nām japo, kirat karo, vand chhako', he stood for several values while he also fought various social evils

Kajal of India reaps ‘reward’ of marrying a Pakistani

The case of Kajal differs from love jihad stories: a country rather than an individual has dashed her hopes, but there is a similarity, too

Congress to help in Maha’ govt formation under 5 conditions

They just begin with not letting a Thackeray be the chief minister, but even otherwise, Congress and NCP leaders are not getting along well

Jharkhand BJP haunted by Maharashtra alliance woes?

A BJP source said that the outcome of Maharashtra affected the party's Jharkhand policy where it refused to give 'winnable' seats away

Industrial production at 8-year low in September

Most industrial groups registered negative growth rates in the period, reminiscent of 2011-12 when manufacturing had gone into a tailspin

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this: