Saturday 28 January 2023
- Advertisement -
EducationWhy IPCC could not provide best estimate of global warming

Why IPCC could not provide best estimate of global warming

Cambridge: Harvard University researchers have resolved a conflict in estimates of how much the will warm in response to a doubling of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. That conflict — between temperature ranges based on global models and paleoclimate records and ranges generated from historical observations — prevented the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) from providing the best estimate in its most recent report for how much the will warm as a result of a doubling of CO2 emissions.

The researchers found that the low range of temperature increase — between 1°C and 3°C — offered by the historical observations did not take into account long-term warming patterns. When these patterns are taken into account, the researchers found that not only do temperatures fall within the canonical range of 1.5°C to 4.5°C but that even higher ranges, perhaps up to 6°C, may also be possible.

The research is published in Science Advances.

It’s well documented that different parts of the planet warm at different speeds. The land over the northern hemisphere, for example, warms significantly faster than water in the Southern Ocean.

“The historical pattern of warming is that most of the warming has occurred over land, in particular over the northern hemisphere,” said Cristian Proistosescu, PhD ’17, and first of the paper. “This pattern of warming is known as the fast mode — you put CO2 in the atmosphere and very quickly after that, the land in the northern hemisphere is going to warm.”

But there is also a slow mode of warming, which can take centuries to realize. That warming, which is most associated with the Southern Ocean and the Eastern Equatorial Pacific, comes with positive feedback loops that amplify the process. For example, as the oceans warm, cloud cover decreases and a white reflecting surface is replaced with a dark absorbent surface.

The researchers developed a mathematical model to parse the two different modes within different models.

“The models simulate a warming pattern like today’s, but indicate that strong feedbacks kick in when the Southern Ocean and Eastern Equatorial Pacific eventually warm, leading to higher overall temperatures than would simply be extrapolated from the warming seen to date,” said Peter Huybers, Professor of and Planetary Sciences and of Environmental Science and Engineering at the Harvard John A Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) and co- of the paper.

Huybers and Proistosescu found that while the slow mode of warming contributes a great deal to the ultimate amount of global warming, it is barely present in present-day warming patterns. “Historical observations give us a lot of insight into how changes and are an important test of our climate models,” said Huybers, “but there is no perfect analogue for the changes that are coming.”

Story Source:

Materials provided by Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied SciencesNote: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal Reference:

  1. Cristian Proistosescu, Peter J Huybers. Slow mode reconciles historical and model-based estimates of climate sensitivityScience Advances, 2017; 3 (7): e1602821 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1602821

Cite This Page:

Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. “Reconciling predictions of change: New framework accounts for conflicting estimates of global temperature increases.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 5 July 2017.
Click/tap on a tag for more on the subject


Of late

More like this