20 C
New Delhi
Friday 22 November 2019
India Elections Petition that could have helped Trinamool narrative dismissed

Petition that could have helped Trinamool narrative dismissed

A vacation bench comprising Justices Arun Mishra and MR Shah said, 'Since the election is over, we are not inclined to entertain this petition under Article 32.'


- Advertisment -

Subscribe to our newsletter

You will get all our latest news and articles via email when you subscribe

The email despatches will be non-commercial in nature
Disputes, if any, subject to jurisdiction in New Delhi

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to entertain a petition that challenged the Election Commission’s appointment of two retired bureaucrats as observers in West Bengal for the Lok Sabha polls. The apex court said the voting was already over, rejecting the petitioner’s view that it wasn’t over until the results were declared.

The commission (EC) had appointed Vivek Dubey as the central police observer for West Bengal and Jharkhand, and Ajay Nayak as the special observer for West Bengal. Petitioner Ramu Mandi had alleged that Dubey and Nayak had been appointed in contravention of the law to ensure a certain party is favoured in the conduct of the Lok Sabha election.

Why the petition was dismissed

A vacation bench comprising Justices Arun Mishra and MR Shah said, “Since the election is over, we are not inclined to entertain this petition under Article 32.” The bench, however, told Mandi, who contested the polls as an independent candidate from Barrackpore constituency of West Bengal, that he was free to approach the Calcutta High Court.

Much as Mandi was an independent candidate, the acceptance of his petition would have helped West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee’s conspiracy theory that employees of the central government (both in the security forces and in civilian administration) helped the BJP during the polls.


Trinamool alleges central forces making people vote BJP

Barrackpore was one of the seven constituencies in West Bengal where polling was held in the fifth phase of the general elections.

During the hearing on Tuesday, the counsel appearing for the EC said that polling for the Lok Sabha elections was already over.

The counsel for Mandi said that although the polling was over, results of the general elections have not been declared yet.

“The election process is still going on. Results are yet to come,” the lawyer said.

To this, the bench said, “You go to the high court. We are permitting you to go to the high court”.

The petitioner’s counsel then said that judicial work in the high court there was affected due to the lawyers’ strike in Kolkata. He said he was “apprehensive”, alleging that these observers would “indulge in favouritism and partisanship” and their appointment will directly be against his interest as an Independent candidate.

“There appears to be no reasonable or cogent reasons to nominate or appoint retired officers as observers especially when there are multiple senior officers who are currently in service and are known to have impeccable integrity and reputation,” the plea said.

Mandi further alleged that the observers were causing “prejudice” to him and he apprehends that his chances of being elected was being jeopardized by their “illegal” appointment. “Numerous attempts have been made by them to jeopardize the election process by making unnecessary and unwarranted statements in public about the West Bengal’s purported precarious condition,” he claimed in the plea.

The petition had also alleged that Dubey and Nayak’s appointments as observers did not fulfil the requirement laid down under the Representation of the People Act, since they were retired bureaucrats and not “officers of government”.

On 6 May, the apex court had sought responses from the EC, West Bengal government and others on Mandi’s petition.

Related editorial

Mamata Banerjee’s rule a blot on Indian democracy

Leave a Reply


Anil Ambani: From Status Of Tycoon To Insolvency

Study the career of Anil Ambani, and you will get a classic case of decisions you ought not take as a businessman and time you better utilise

तवलीन सिंह, यह कैसा स्वाभिमान?

‘जिस मोदी सरकार का पांच साल सपोर्ट किया उसी ने मेरे बेटे को देश निकाला दे दिया,’ तवलीन सिंह ने लिखा। क्या आपने किसी क़ीमत के बदले समर्थन किया?

Rafale: One Embarrassment, One Snub For Opposition

Supreme Court accepts Rahul Gandhi's apology for attributing to it his allegation, rejects the review petition challenging the Rafale verdict

Guru Nanak Jayanti: What First Sikh Guru Taught

While Guru Nanak urged people to 'nām japo, kirat karo, vand chhako', he stood for several values while he also fought various social evils

Muhammed Who Inconvenienced Muslims

Archaeologist KK Muhammed had earlier got on the nerves of the leftist intelligentsia for exposing their nexus with Islamic extremists
- Advertisement -


व्यापम घोटाला मामले में 12 जालसाज़ों, 7 बिचौलियों सहित 31 दोषी

व्यापम घोटाले में MPPEB के ज़रिए कथित तौर पर अयोग्य उम्मीदवारों को राजकीय व्यावसायिक कॉलेजों में प्रवेश दिया गया और सरकारी नौकरियां भी दी गईं

Shah: Congress stalled Ram Mandir, we’ll make a grand one

Devoting a large part of his election speech to the issue of Ram temple in Ayodhya, Amit Shah also tried to woo the tribal population

Naval guns, 13 for Rs 7,100 crore, from US to India

The Mk 45 naval guns are designed for use against surface warships, anti-aircraft and shore bombardment to support amphibious operations

BJD to be rewarded, but what’s cooking with NCP?

Prime Minister Narendra Modi does not praise any section of the opposition by accident; the appreciation of the BJD and NCP indicated a deal

Electoral bonds akin to institutionalising corruption: INC

Objecting to the introduction of electoral bonds by the government, INC MP Manish Tewari based his speech largely on a HuffPost report

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this: