20 C
New Delhi
Friday 15 November 2019
India No judge can claim to have never passed a...

No judge can claim to have never passed a wrong order: SC

bench made these comments while dealing with a plea filed by a Bihar-based judicial officer, now dead, who had challenged the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against him

-

- Advertisment -

Subscribe to our newsletter

You will get all our latest news and articles via email when you subscribe

The email despatches will be non-commercial in nature
Disputes, if any, subject to jurisdiction in New Delhi

No judge can claim that he or she has never passed a “wrong order”, the Supreme Court has said while observing that disciplinary action should not be initiated against a judicial officer merely for passing wrong order unless there is evidence of extraneous reason. Independence of judiciary is “sacrosanct”, and unless there are clear-cut allegations of misconduct, the gratification of any kind and extraneous influences, disciplinary proceedings should not be initiated merely on the ground that a wrong order has been passed by a judicial officer, the apex court said.

“To err is human and not one of us, who has held judicial office, can claim that we have never passed a wrong order,” a bench of justices Deepak Gupta and Aniruddha Bose said in their order passed last week. In a country, which follows the rule of law, independence of the judiciary is sacrosanct. There can be no rule of law, there can be no democracy unless there is a strong, fearless and independent judiciary,” the bench said.

Independence and fearlessness are not only expected at the level of the superior courts but also from the district judiciary as most of the litigants cannot afford to come to the high courts or the Supreme Court, the bench said. “Therefore, it is equally important, if not more important, that the judiciary at the district level and at the taluka level is absolutely honest, fearless and free from any pressure and is able to decide cases only on the basis of the facts on file, uninfluenced by any pressure from any quarters whatsoever,” it said.

The bench made these comments while dealing with a plea filed by a Bihar-based judge, now dead, who had challenged the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against him.

Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him on two alleged counts — for granting bail to some accused in a murder case despite the fact that their bail petitions were dismissed by the high court and for acquitting an accused in a separate narcotics case and closing the proceedings in “great haste”.

In its order, the bench said that, time and again, the apex court had laid down the criteria on which actions should be taken against judicial officers.

“Repeatedly, this court has cautioned the high courts that action should not be taken against judicial officers only because wrong orders are passed,” the bench said. “No doubt, there has to be zero tolerance for corruption and if there are allegations of corruption, misconduct or of acts unbecoming a judicial officer, these must be dealt with strictly,” it said.

The bench said if there is prima facie material to show reckless misconduct on the part of a judge while discharging his duties, the high court would be entitled to initiate disciplinary proceedings but such material should be evident from the orders and should also be placed on record.

“We would, however, like to make it clear that we are in no manner indicating that if a judicial officer passes a wrong order, then no action is to be taken,” the bench said.

“In case a judicial officer passes orders which are against settled legal norms but there is no allegation of any extraneous influences leading to the passing of such orders then the appropriate action which the High Court should take is to record such material on the administrative side and place it on the service record of the judicial officer concerned,” it said.

The bench allowed the petition filed before it and quashed the orders passed against the officer.

Leave a Reply

Opinion

Rafale: One Embarrassment, One Snub For Opposition

Supreme Court accepts Rahul Gandhi's apology for attributing to it his allegation, rejects the review petition challenging the Rafale verdict

Guru Nanak Jayanti: What First Sikh Guru Taught

While Guru Nanak urged people to 'nām japo, kirat karo, vand chhako', he stood for several values while he also fought various social evils

Muhammed Who Inconvenienced Muslims

Archaeologist KK Muhammed had earlier got on the nerves of the leftist intelligentsia for exposing their nexus with Islamic extremists

UCC Now, Rajnath Hints: Here’s How Modi Can Do It

Modi can argue in a manner to make UCC look secular and pro-Hindu at the same time, making a Muslim or Christian counterargument impossible

Tulasi: Two Stories, One Reason For Devotion

The Padma Purana, Devi Bhagavatam and Skanda Purana tell the story of Tulasi or Vrinda differently but the essence of devotion is a constant
- Advertisement -

Elsewhere

Ram temple construction trust bill in winter session

While the government wants to begin the work of trust formation for the Ram temple right away, some existing trusts are vying for the deal

Breast cancer increasingly affecting 25-30-year olds

Early detection and treatment can save you if you are afflicted by breast cancer; begin the test at home and then consult an expert (doctor)

BJP makes 13 rebel MLAs Karnataka by-poll candidates

By allowing the rebels to contest elections and yet keeping them disqualified, the Supreme Court had put an obligation on the Karnataka CM

Khattar Cabinet has oldest, youngest Chautala

Khattar Cabinet's average assets are worth Rs 17.42 crore, with the low of Anil Vij's Rs 1.17 crore and high of JP Dalal's Rs 76.75 crore

Rafale: One Embarrassment, One Snub For Opposition

Supreme Court accepts Rahul Gandhi's apology for attributing to it his allegation, rejects the review petition challenging the Rafale verdict

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this: