Wednesday 14 April 2021
- Advertisement -
PoliticsIndiaNirav Modi can be extradited to India, rules UK judge

Nirav Modi can be extradited to India, rules UK judge

A UK court agreed that Nirav Modi threatened witnesses and tampered with evidence, sending the extradition order to the British government

Sirf News needs to recruit journalists in large numbers to increase the volume of news stories. Please help us pay them by donating. Click on the button below to contribute.

- Advertisement -

United Kingdom judge on 25 February said a prima facie case had been established against Nirav Modi on charges of fraud and money laundering in the estimated $ 2-billion Punjab National Bank (PNB) scam case after a nearly two-year-long legal battle.

The judge at the Westminster Magistrate’s Court, accepting the money laundering charges against Nirav Modi, found India’s case that he threatened witnesses and tampered with evidence credible and strong. The court sent Nirav Modi extradition order to the UK Secretary of State.

The UK extradition judge said there was no reason for Modi to believe he would be denied justice if he were to be extradited to India. The judge added that Barrack 12 at Arthur Road Jail in Mumbai was fit for Nirav Modi. Prison conditions at the said part of Arthur Road Jail in Mumbai, where Modi is to be held, have been in focus as the Indian government submitted an updated video recording of the cell to highlight that it meets all human rights requirements of natural light and ventilation.

The extradition judge dismissed Nirav Modi’s “mental health concerns” too. He said, “They are not unusual in a man in his circumstances.”

The 49-year-old diamond trader had been arrested on an extradition warrant on 19 March 2019. He appeared via videolink from Wandsworth Prison for a series of court hearings in the extradition case. His multiple attempts at seeking bail have been repeatedly turned down, at the level of the magistrate as well as that of the high court. Both the courts agreed he was a flight risk.

Nirav Modi is the subject of two sets of criminal proceedings, with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) case relating to a large-scale fraud upon PNB through the fraudulent obtaining of letters of undertaking (LoUs) or loan agreements, and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) case relating to the laundering of the proceeds of that fraud. He faces two additional charges of “causing the disappearance of evidence” and intimidating witnesses or “criminal intimidation to cause death”, which were added on to the CBI case.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), arguing on behalf of the Indian government, has sought to establish a prima facie case against him and to establish that there are no human rights issues blocking his extradition to India. CPS barrister Helen Malcolm has argued that the jeweller presided over a “ponzi-like scheme where new LoUs were used to repay old ones”.

A ponzi scheme typically refers to an investment scam which generates funds for earlier investors with money taken from later investors and the CPS has claimed that Modi used his firms – Diamonds R Us, Solar Exports and Stellar Diamonds – to make fraudulent use of PNB’s LoUs in a conspiracy with banking officials.

They have played videos in court as proof of Modi’s involvement in intimidating dummy officers of his companies to remain out of the reach of Indian investigating authorities.

Modi’s defence team, led by barrister Clare Montgomery, has claimed that the entire issue is a commercial dispute involving “authorised though ill-advised lending” that took place in “broad daylight”. It is claimed that none of his actions meet the legal threshold of perverting the course of justice or amounted to fraud.

Besides, the defence has relied on arguments around Modi’s precarious mental health condition, as someone who has a family history of depression and suicide.

During a series of hearings in the course of the extradition case last year and early this year, the Westminster Magistrates Court heard detailed arguments from both sides about why Modi’s “deteriorating” mental health condition does or does not meet the Section 91 threshold of the Extradition Act 2003 — which was most recently been used in the UK to block the extradition of Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange on the grounds of it being “unjust and oppressive” as he is a high suicide risk.

The CPS challenged the stance of the defence and called for an independent evaluation of medical records by a consultant psychiatrist for appropriate assurances to be acquired by the authorities in terms of his care in India.

Modi’s legal battle marks one of a number of high-profile extradition cases involving accused Indian economic offenders in the UK. While former Kingfisher Airlines boss Vijay Mallya remains on bail as a “confidential” matter related to his extradition to India is resolved, accused arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari’s extradition case is scheduled for its next hearing in April.

In February 2020, wanted cricket bookie Sanjeev Chawla was extradited to face charges in India and became the first extradition of its kind under the India-UK Extradition Treaty, signed in 1992.

A previous extradition of Samirbhai Vinubhai Patel, wanted in connection with the Godhra riots in Gujarat, from the UK to India in October 2016 had been uncontested and therefore did not have to go through various levels of appeals in the UK courts.

- Advertisement -

Sirf News is now Koo-ing. Click on the button below to join our handle (@sirf_news) and stay updated with our posts on the platform that won the Atmanirbhar App Innovation Challenge, 2020

Sirf News is now on Telegram as well. Click on the button below to join our channel (@sirfnewsdotcom) and stay updated with our unique approach to news

Views

- Advertisement -

Related news

- Advertisement -

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Translate »
[prisna-google-website-translator]
%d bloggers like this: