New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday termed as “prima facie arbitrary” the arrest of Bharatiya Jana Yuva Morcha activist for posting a caricature in the form of a meme of West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on social media. The apex court pulled up the State government for the delay in releasing her.
As reported yesterday on Sirf News, while the initial order from the court asking the defendant to apologise for her action was reversed an hour after the two sides left the court, as BJYM activist Priyanka Sharma’s lawyer was called back and informed that the condition of apology for the bail had been lifted, the police had not released her immediately.
A vacation bench comprising justices Indira Banerjee and Sanjiv Khanna was informed by the counsel of activist Priyanka Sharma’s brother that she was not released from jail on Tuesday despite the apex court’s order granting her bail and ordering her immediate release.
However, the counsel for West Bengal government informed the bench that she has been released from jail at 9:40 AM today.
“Why 9:40 AM today? The order was passed in your presence,” the bench told the State counsel.
When the State’s counsel referred to the jail manual, the bench shot back, “Jail manual can’t have precedence over an order of the Supreme Court.”
“No. This is not done. First of all the arrest was prima facie arbitrary,” the bench said.
West Bengal Government's Counsel says in Supreme Court that 'Priyanka Sharma was released at 9:40 am, today.' SC bench asks,' why she was not released immediately?' https://t.co/sVdHSv77WU
— ANI (@ANI) May 15, 2019
Senior advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul, appearing for Priyanka’s brother Rajib Sharma who filed the plea in the apex court, told the bench that despite the apex court’s Tuesday order granting her bail she had to spend another night behind the bars.
Kaul told the bench that jail authorities Tuesday told them that they have to either bring certified copies of the apex court’s order or approach the court of the chief judicial magistrate concerned for her release.
“If she is not released, the consequences will follow,” the bench said and warned it will issue contempt to officials concerned if Sharma was not released from jail immediately. “She should be released from jail within half an hour,” the bench said.
The bench asked Kaul to get instructions whether she has been released from jail or not.
After a few minutes, Kaul informed the bench that Sharma has been released from jail today.
Kaul told the court that they have moved a separate application, in which they have said that though the closure report in the case was filed in the trial court on May 13, the apex court was not informed during yesterday’s hearing.
“If the Supreme Court was informed yesterday that the closure report has been filed in the trial court, then the apex court might not have asked her to apologise,” Kaul said.
The apex court had Tuesday granted bail to Sharma and asked to apologise for posting the morphed image of Banerjee.
During the hearing on Wednesday, Kaul said the counsel for West Bengal was present in the apex court during yesterday’s hearing but did not apprise the court about the closure report.
“You know very well what happens to a counsel appearing for the State,” the bench observed.
To this Kaul said, “I am not on the counsel but I am on the conduct of the State.”
However, the bench told Kaul to check up whether Sharma has been released from jail or not.
“If she is not released, we will issue contempt,” the bench said.
However, Kaul said when the apex court had yesterday said that Priyanka should be released forthwith, why jail authorities did not release her.
“Does the West Bengal State or the police have right to detain her even for a minute after the Supreme Court’s order,” Kaul asked. He told the bench that their application be listed for hearing next week.
However, the bench said since Sharma has been released there was no urgency and the application will be heard in July after the summer vacation.
After taking instructions, Kaul told the bench that Sharma has been released from jail but jail authorities “forced” her to give an apology before being released from the prison.
Sharma was arrested on 10 May by the police under section 500 (defamation) of the IPC and under other provisions of the Information Technology Act on a complaint of a local Trinamool Congress leader Vibhas Hazra against the meme. She was sent to 14-day judicial custody by a trial court there.
The apex court, which initially said Sharma’s apology will be a bail condition, later clarified that it will not be a condition for bail but she should apologise for sharing the post at the time of her release.
The court had also sought a response from the West Bengal government on whether a person can be arrested for sharing a post or meme on social media and posted the matter for further hearing after the summer vacation.
On Monday, Kaul had mentioned the matter in the top court for urgent hearing, saying Sharma was forced to move the apex court as there was a complete strike in local courts till 14 May in Howrah and moreover, she had been remanded in 14-day judicial custody by a Howrah court on 11 May.
Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) entails punishment for defamation with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
Sharma had shared on Facebook the meme in which Banerjee’s face has been superimposed on that of the face of actor Priyanka Chopra from the MET Gala event in New York. Sharma’s arrest was followed by protests from the BJP and other social media users.