28.1 C
New Delhi
Saturday 19 October 2019
India Litigant show-caused, penalised for frivolous PIL appeals against Budget

Litigant show-caused, penalised for frivolous PIL appeals against Budget

In December 2018, the Supreme Court had imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on advocate Manohar Lal Sharma for filing a PIL against then Finance Minister Arun Jaitley over an issue related to the Reserve Bank of India's capital reserve


- Advertisment -

New Delhi: Within hours of Union Finance Minister Piyush Goyal presenting the interim Budget in Parliament on Friday, an infamous litigant filed a petition in the Supreme Court seeking to get it quashed on the alleged ground that there is no Constitutional provision for an interim Budget.

The petition, filed by advocate Manohar Lal Sharma, submitted that, under the Constitution, there is only provision for presenting a full annual Budget and vote-on-account.

About the litigant

In December last year, the top court had imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on Sharma for filing a public interest litigation against the then Finance Minister Arun Jaitley over an issue related to the Reserve Bank of India’s capital reserve.

Sharma is also recalled for defending the rapists in the 16 December 2012 incident whose victim was referred to as Nirbhaya by some media houses and Damini by others.

Alleging that the act of Sharma of casting aspersions on the characters of the victims of the incident was inhumane, scandalous, unjustifiable and a direct affront to — and in violation of — the dignity of women, the Supreme Court Women Lawyers Association filed a petition before the highest court seeking restriction on the entry of Sharma in the premises of the apex court.

In May 2015, the apex court had issued a notice to Sharma asking him why he should not be debarred from filing and/or canvassing any PIL on account of the “irresponsible and scandalous allegations levelled by him” against MPs in one of his petitions. He later apologised for the act after which he was allowed to file PILs with certain checks.

Difference between Budget and vote-on-account

A vote-on-account is an approval taken in an election year for a limited period for government spending; a full-fledged budget is presented later by the newly elected government.

However, technically, a Budget may be presented in the election year if the Election Commission has not announced the dates of the elections yet, said Bibek Debroy, economist, permanent member of the NITI Aayog and chairman of the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister, recently in an interview to a media house.

A vote-on-account is presented only when elections have been called because it’s purely a temporary government, said Debroy. Since the government cannot stop functioning, and since parliamentary sanction is needed so that the outgoing government can spend out of the consolidated fund of India, a vote-on-account is presented, he said.

Website Business Jargons defines a vote-on-account as “the special provision given to the government to obtain the vote of Parliament to withdraw money when the budget for the new financial year is not released or the elections are underway, and the caretaker government is in place. Simply, (it is) the approval given by Parliament to withdraw a certain sum of money from the consolidated funds of India…”

The Election Commission has not announced the dates of the Lok Sabha election yet. Hence, the ‘grievance’ of the litigant is not expected to hold.

Union Finance Minister Piyush Goyal presented in Parliament the interim Budget on Friday, proposing an array of incentives for all sections of society.

The 2019 Lok Sabha election is expected to take place in April-May.

Subscribe to our newsletter

You will get all our latest news and articles via email when you subscribe

The email despatches will be non-commercial in nature
Disputes, if any, subject to jurisdiction in New Delhi

Leave a Reply


Karva Chauth: Faith, legend behind viewing the moon through a sieve

The legend and Karva Chauth rituals vary across Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Punjab, Delhi and, in south India, Andhra Pradesh

Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir, Here We Come!

Study Wuhan and Mamallapuram in the backdrop of the fact that things are not quite working out in China-Pakistan economic relations, notwithstanding the urge of the communist state to contain India and that of the Islamic state to challenge it

Slowdown Has Reasons Other Than GST, Demonetisation

When all economic sectors decline, the mood of the market turns sombre, turning investors all the more reluctant to pump in money; the interdependence of industries means that the slowdown suffered by one would affect many

Where China & India, Resisting & Improving Democracy, Meet

What you see in Hong Kong is China resisting democracy; what you see in Kashmir is India promoting it; a reasonably capitalist China does not offer freedom politically but India, held back at times by the choice of the people, is still opening up; there could be a point of convergence as the two nations move in opposite directions

Omega-3: Study published in BMJ claiming no benefit for type 2 diabetes has myopic vision

Most respondents in the omega-3 study published in the BMJ are from Europe and North America; such results can hardly be applied worldwide
- Advertisement -


PIL before Ayodhya verdict to scrap Act on places of worship

Hindus would hardly complain that their faith is held ransom to legality as the PIL challenges their right to question some historical wrongs

Indrani Mukerjea claims to have bribed Chidambarams with $ 50,00,000

When Indrani and Peter Mukerjea approached Chidambaram for FIPB approval for FDI in INX Media, the then finance minister had allegedly sought the bribe

‘Moulding of relief’ affidavits for Ayodhya filed in Supreme Court

Know the provision of moulding of relief given to all parties to the dispute when they have argued their respective cases but the verdict is as yet reserved

Kamlesh Tiwari murder suspects Rashid, Faizan, Mohsin arrested

A Bijnor-Surat Islamic link emerges in the case of murder of pro-Hindu activist Kamlesh Tiwari in the preliminary investigation by UP Police

Jio, Airtel spar over maximum ring duration in outgoing calls

Airtel wants to keep the phone ringing time of 45 s during the outgoing call. But Jio is trying to reduce this time to 25 s

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you

%d bloggers like this: