34.7 C
New Delhi
Friday 29 May 2020

LGBT Rights: Beyond Court’s Rights


Reforms By Modi Run Into Tired Socialist Criticism

The motley group of right-thinking Indians in this socialist society should not only promote the reforms announced last week but also push every Indian government and political party towards better economics
Sirf News Editorial Board
Sirf News Editorial Boardhttps://www.sirfnews.com
Voicing the collective stand of Sirf News' (सिर्फ़ News') editors on a given issue

In India

कसाब की पहचान करने वाले पहले गवाह हरिश्चंद्र का निधन

कामा अस्पताल के निकट हरिश्चंद्र को दो गोली लगी थी, जब 10 आतंकवादियों ने इस हमले को अंजाम दिया था, उन्होंने कसाब के साथी इस्माइल को अपने ऑफिस के बैग से मारा था

योगी सरकार 11.50 लाख प्रवासी श्रमिकों को उपलब्ध कराएगी रोजगार

योगी ने दूसरे राज्यों से उत्तर प्रदेश के 26 लाख प्रवासी श्रमिकों की घर वापसी कराई है, श्रमिकों और कामगारों को प्रदेश में ही रोजगार देने का वादा किया है

Any judgment by the larger bench of the Supreme Court can be reviewed in the near future while an amended law or the scrapping of Section 377 will not be undone until science and society demand it in a distant, future generation

How two consenting adults treat each other in the privacy of their bedroom should be of no concern of anybody else. The fundamental premise of individual liberty makes the further argument as to whether a certain form of sex is natural or unnatural redundant. The precondition “consenting” also negates the possibility of the law permitting molestation or rape, to deal with which there exists Section 376A, the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2013. This must have been the consideration that made the Supreme Court agree to refer its previous decision on the issue to a larger bench for review. However, the last verdict on the constitutionality of Section 377 was not erroneous either, given that the judiciary cannot make a law; it can only interpret what is given to it in the shape of Acts by the legislature. Hence, the apex court had, in its wisdom in 2014, passed the buck rightly to Parliament where, individual views of a few legislators notwithstanding, the polity is collectively wary of hurting the sentiments of the majority — the heterosexual — that has been brought up on a version of Hinduism that got influenced by Islamic and Victorian sense of morality in a period spanning a millennium when the nation was ruled by central Asians and Europeans. Yet, this is a grey area since the term “homosexuality” does not figure anywhere in the law in question, making the court’s intervention a case of interpretation rather than legislation. Pending a new enactment or amendment by the timid bunch of 795 politicians, the court can certainly say whether the law would apply to homosexuals alone, or it has in its ambit issues like oral, anal and other forms of sexual acts between heterosexual adults and, additionally, the case of masturbation (which some religions do not approve of either). The second and third possibilities, arising out of the archaic legalese of the Section, should force every citizen into a rethink. In the case of a complaint by the wife in a hetero couple — rare but not impossible — the husband could be despatched behind the bars for indulging in, or forcing the partner into, a sexual act deemed “against the order of nature”!

It is unfortunate for the country that neither its traditionalists nor its modernists are ready to do a thorough research on the unsettled debate to alter their respective, rigidly held, unscientific positions. The first group refuses to accept that some people can be born homosexual due to medical reasons rather than ‘become’ homosexuals by choice. They fear the abrogation of the law would tempt some otherwise ‘normal’ people to turn ‘Western’ in outlook and, overnight, switch their orientation. The second group is as ignorant; it insists on its right to choice, belittling the significance of biology that made some individuals different, thus emboldening the argument of the opponent. Further, its emphasis on the right to privacy — ensured by an unrelated judgment of the highest court — is defied by its own act of grotesque parades in the streets in garish costumes. The straight don’t gesticulate with their partners in public places, do they? These queer marches achieve little more than attract further aversion of the remaining society. The minority community’s clamour for the right of choice has also suppressed a vital logic that goes in their favour: The mediaeval law makes medical treatment of homosexuals difficult, as the doctors ask for police clearances. When they move around untreated, it aggravates the risk of spread of sexually transmitted diseases, attacks of which the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people are more vulnerable to. A law that only helps unscrupulous policemen blackmail the queer and push many of them to already crowded prisons full of convicts — who, the whole society believes, are criminals — should not continue. It does not serve any larger purpose of society.

The lack of enlightenment on both sides of the debate makes the vote-conscious politicians avoid imparting statesmen-like education to the people, and weak-kneed legislators shirk the responsibility of legislating in tandem with the times. Section 377 has met with the same fate that the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute did or triple talaq almost did. What should have been sorted out in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha is now for election-proof judges to resolve. Ironically, if the Supreme Court heard a review petition once and dismissed it in 2014 and yet it is ready to reconsider its verdict in 2018, the judgment that will come from the larger bench — which can, at best, be like the Delhi High Court’s act of reading down the law — can be reviewed farther into the future, too. This would keep the LGBT people on the tenterhooks for ever. Ultimately, it is beyond the judiciary to scrap the ambiguously worded law. Why don’t the likes of petitioner Navtej Singh Johar and non-governmental organisation Naz, therefore, address public representatives instead?

Subscribe to our newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

- Advertisement -


Tirupati: Where Protector Of Three Worlds Needs Protection

Tirupati temple authorities were considering the liquidation of land-assets and buildings donated by devotees to Lord Venkateswara to help tide over what the management called “COVID-19 related financial crisis” and an inability to pay staff salaries

আম্ফানের আঘাতে চূর্ণ মমতার আস্ফালন

গ্রামবাঙ্গালার বিস্তৃত অংশে শাসক দলের স্থানীয় আধিকারিকদের এতটাই প্রভাব এবং ক্ষমতা যে DBT সত্ত্বেও ভীতিপ্রদর্শন করে নিজেদের কাটমানি বা অংশটুকু তারা ক্ষেত্রবিশেষে আদায় করতে পারে

Paatal Lok: Antidote To Anti-Hindu Propaganda

A Family Man that upholds the Pakistani PoV on Kashmir or the ilk of Leila and Paatal Lok that defames Hinduism cannot be made if nationalist subscribers react wisely


योगी सरकार 11.50 लाख प्रवासी श्रमिकों को उपलब्ध कराएगी रोजगार

योगी ने दूसरे राज्यों से उत्तर प्रदेश के 26 लाख प्रवासी श्रमिकों की घर वापसी कराई है, श्रमिकों और कामगारों को प्रदेश में ही रोजगार देने का वादा किया है

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this: