Thursday 29 October 2020

Indira Gandhi-KGB Nexus Became Evident In Post-Shastri India

On 2 October, a recollection of post-Lal Bahadur Shastri India that suggests Indira Gandhi had a motive to see her predecessor eliminated

More Views

This Is Jihad, Not Love, Tanishq

The House of Tata, by showcasing an ad film of Tanishq that misleads impressionable minds into life in hell, has committed the unpardonable

सूरत का आदिल सलीम नूरानी यूँ करता था हिन्दुओं की भावनाओं का बिज़नस

अब यह धूर्त अपने रेस्टोरेंट का नाम कसाई थाल हलाल थाल इत्यादि नहीं रखकर अब हिंदुओं के नाम पर रखकर हिंदुओं से पैसा कमा रहे हैं

हाथरस ― अनजाने में ‘रिवर्स ऑनर किलिंग’

मतलब यह अनजाने में हुई 'ऑनर किलिंग' है जिसको 'गैंग रेप के बाद हत्या' बताकर उसका दोष लड़की के प्रेमी और मदद को दौड़े कुछ अन्य लड़कों पर मढ़ दिया गया
Pankaj Saxena
Pankaj Saxenahttps://www.sirfnews.com/
Author writing on history, Hindu architecture and literature, chief editor of Indic Varta, currently working at Centre for Indic Studies

Of all the conspiracy theories in the world, I believe in one. That Lal Bahadur Shastri was indeed murdered in Tashkent by Soviet communist agents. Do I have direct evidence? No. But circumstantial evidence is too hard here to ignore. The communists had been grooming Indira Gandhi as a communist agent even while closet communist Jawaharlal Nehru was the prime minister. Lal Bahadur Shastri was such an interruption in their plan to take over India that he had to be eliminated. He was a rare man. He feared no one. He feared nothing. With a man as small and as gentle he was the greatest nightmare of communist secret agents come true. This article will tell you how Indira Gandhi really turned over the country to the communists.

In 2005, an otherwise dry academic book called The Mitrokhin Archives II, about the activities of the KGB in the Third World countries, created an unlikely political uproar in India. One might wonder what could possibly pique the interest of an ordinary Indian politician in the activities of the secret agency of a faraway country of a bygone era. The answer is very interesting.

The book claimed, quite damagingly for the Indian National Congress, that many of its top leaders, diplomats and statesmen were working as the agents of the KGB, the Soviet secret services. The rot was deep and politicians very high up in the ladder in the INC were directly passing top secrets of India’s activities to the Soviet Union. The book claimed that the Soviet spy agency infiltrated even the personal office of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, rendering the security and integrity of the office of the highest executive of India deeply compromised. The Indian secret operations, in other words, were an open book for the communists in the Soviet Union. They were in a position to manipulate India at will.

Several newspapers published reports about the uproar and the book, summarising its contents in pithy lines. The politicians of INC dismissed the charges in righteous indignation. The contemptuous outrage they showed at the charges, without any effort to explain them away, tallied with their customary behavior whenever facing criticism on the grounds of compromising national security.

In 2005, the UPA 1 had just come to power. The government was drunk on its ‘success’ in the 2004 elections. The left-leaning Indian media, the hand maiden of the INC was all too happy to brush under the carpet any news portraying the party and its most hallowed totem, the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty, in bad light. Soon the issue was hushed up and Indians promptly forgot all about it.

The charges in the book, however, were extremely serious. That even the highest echelons of government and other institutions were compromised and that Indian foreign policy was an open book for half of the world to see is something which should put even a banana republic to shame, let alone the largest democracy in the world. It is a charge which deserves to be examined again. Who was Mitrokhin and what do his archives say?

Vasili Mitrokhin was a senior archivist in the Foreign Intelligence department of the Directorate of the KGB. His job, in the pre-internet era was to archive the secret reports. He was a low level officer in the department and was usually kept out of important meetings of the secret agency, but due to his special assignment of archiving records he was privy to the dirtiest secrets of the Soviet Union, the KGB and their activities all over the world.

Being a man of conscience, a rarity in a harsh and punishing regime like Soviet Union, Mitrokhin thought of duplicating the archives for himself. Mitrokhin ‘spent over a decade making notes and transcripts of these highly classified files which, at enormous personal risk, he smuggled daily out of the archives and kept beneath is dacha floor.’Andrew, Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin’s The World Was Going Our Way: The KGB and the Battle for the Third World. Basic Books, 2005. Front Jacket.Like Solzhenitsyn, he had a premonition that some day he will able to tell the world about the nefarious activities of the communist country which claimed to be the Heaven on Earth.

In 1992, after the fall of the Soviet Union, Mitrokhin migrated to the United Kingdom and handed over the archives to the competent authorities. In 1999, the first volume of The Mitrokhin Archive was published with the renowned historian Christopher Andrew focusing on the activities of the KGB in the West. In the second volume, KGB’s activities in the Third World were covered. One of the most important chapters of this book was the one concerning with KGB’s activities in India.

The authenticity of the Mitrokhin archive has been proven, as hundreds of its stories about the secret agents of the KGB across the world have been independently corroborated. What then did the Mitrokhin archive say so bad about the INC and Indian government that it had to be hushed up in angry sermons?

It is no secret that India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru was a closet communist who declared his sympathies for socialism and the Soviet Union whenever the occasions came. Nehru ‘had no doubt that the Soviet revolution had advanced human society by a great leap and had lit a bright flame which could not be smothered.’ [Mitrokhin, 312]

This is not a place to discuss the atrocities of the communists in the Soviet Union, but suffice it to say that the Soviet Union built the greatest array of concentration camps known in the history of human kind and killed more people than the Nazis killed in the Second World War. Even then, the INC led by Nehru was in thralls with the Soviet Union.

The KGB had perfected the art of infiltrating government institutions and India was a cake walk by their standards. “Neither Nehru nor the IB realized how thoroughly the Indian embassy in Moscow was being penetrated by the KGB, using its usual varieties of the honey trap.” [Mitrokhin, 313]

Krishna Menon, the ultra leftist friend and advisor of Nehru was a prime target of the KGB for recruitment as a KGB agent. The KGB residency in New Delhi was authorized in 1962 to strengthen Menon’s position in India and try to enhance his public image. One of the primary ways of supporting Menon like would-be recruits was to fund newspapers. A large section of Indian media even in those days was quite willing to play to the Soviet tune for a certain price. [Mitrokhin, 315]

Sirf News’ Editor-in-Chief Surajit Dasgupta interviews journalist-activist-author Anuj Dhar who has dedicated his life to digging out the truth behind Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose’s disappearance on 18 August 1945. Here, Dhar speaks about the mysterious death of Lal Bahadur Shastri, revealing what he wrote in his book, My Prime Minister Is Dead.

The KGB was apparently grooming Menon for being the successor of Nehru. Menon, it clearly looks like, played by the Soviet tune. Many pro-Soviet diplomatic and defense decisions were taken during his tenure. However the Indo-China war of 1962 seriously dented the reputation of Nehru and most of all Menon; consequently he fell from grace. The KGB had to find another way to infiltrate Indian government and influence policy decisions.

In 1966, Indira Gandhi became the Prime Minister of India. The KGB had been trying to influence Indira Gandhi from 1953 when she visited Soviet Union. Christopher Andrew writes: “As well as keeping her under continuous surveillance, the Second Chief Directorate also surrounded her with handsome, attentive male admirers.” [Mitrokhin, 316] The attention showered on her made obvious impression and she had a very good image of Soviet planning and economic model. The KGB did not just limit its activities to recruiting prominent Indian politicians. It also tried to influence the outcome of elections by financing communist or pro-Soviet candidates.

“After the elections of February 1967, the KGB claimed… that it was able to influence 30 to 40 percent of the new parliament.” [Mitrokhin, 318]

As a result, the new cabinet under Indira Gandhi was more pro-Soviet, pro-Communist than any before. Meanwhile Indira Gandhi, in order to increase her clout within the party, was planning for a split which would oust the INC stalwarts who opposed her. This is when she decided to get the support of the left wing. She nationalized 14 commercial banks. Many new appointments were made in prominent institutions all over the country and ideological communists and Indira loyalists were cherry-picked and air dropped into their new positions.

The communists however did not leave any stone unturned. Not willing to bet everything on Indira Gandhi, the CPI infiltrated Congress Forum for Socialist Action and subverted the party to the left, from within. The Congress had taken an irreversible turn to the left. The KGB had no small role to play in that.

“The Syndicate hinted that Mrs Gandhi intended to “sell” India to the Soviet Union and was using her principal private secretary, Parmeshwar Narain Haksar, as a direct link with Moscow and the Soviet embassy.”

Haksar was a protégé of Krishna Menon and was the primary political advisor and aide of Indira Gandhi. That the KGB must have been successful in influencing him if not recruiting him outright, becomes believable from the fact that Haksar went on an unprecedented nationalisation (usurpation of private properties by the state) drive in the country under Gandhi. Democracy, whatever had remained after Nehru, went out the window under the influence of Haksar under the reign of Indira Gandhi. Soviet communist influence on Haksar and Haksar’s influence on Indira Gandhi became obvious with the infamous secret Treaty of Peace, Friendship and Co-operation. [Mitrokhin, 319]

The influence of the KGB in India in 1970s was steadily increasing under Indira Gandhi’s reign. The illegal residency of the Soviet secret service was upgraded to the status of ‘main residency’ in those years. Directly or indirectly Indira Gandhi was getting influenced by Soviet propaganda and was moving towards increasingly more socialist policies, mostly under the influence of her compromised ministers and advisors.

“In the early 1970s, the KGB presence in India became one of the largest in the world outside the Soviet bloc, Indira Gandhi placed no limit on the number of Soviet diplomats and trade officials, thus allowing the KGB and GRU as many cover positions as they wished- Nor, like many other states, did India object to admitting Soviet intelligence officers who had been expelled by less hospitable regimes.” [Mitrokhin, 321]

In perhaps one of the most shameful of passages describing India, Oleg Kalugin, a high ranking officer KGB officer remembers India as “a model of KGB infiltration of a Third World government… We had scores of sources throughout the Indian government – in intelligence, counter-intelligence, the Defense and Foreign Ministries, and the police.” Oleg Kalugin’s Spymaster: My 32 Years in Intelligence and Espionage against the West. Smith Gryphon, 1994. p. 126-7.

Christopher Andrews puts it into one succinct line: “It seemed like the entire country was for sale…” [Mitrokhin, 322]

This ‘selling of the country’ was quickened under Indira’s rule. She herself was as complicit in corruption as the lowest of the Congress cadre. “Suitcases full of banknotes were said to be routinely taken to Prime Minister’s house. Former Syndicate member SK Patil is reported to have said that Mrs. Gandhi did not even return the suitcases.” [Mitrokhin, 322]

Indira Gandhi never cared where the money came from. She was just interested in getting more and more for running the Party. Although it is very difficult to believe that she was not at all aware that a large part of this money came from the Soviet Union, from the KGB. The principal fundraiser of Congress (Indira), Lalit Narayan Mishra was in cahoots with the KGB and many shady organizations for procuring funds for the Party. In 1975 around the KGB spent around 11 million rubles to build support for Indira. The KGB spies inside Indira Gandhi’s cabinet and in the media also had a role in influencing Indira to declare Emergency.

If the communists were hugely successful in infiltrating the academic and political institutions of India, in the field of Indian media they were having a field day. According to the KGB, it had 10 Indian newspapers on its payroll in 1973. In 1975 it planted 5,510 articles in Indian newspapers. ‘Public protests’ were arranged by the KGB on standard price. [Mitrokhin, 325]

In 1977, despite the efforts of the KGB Indira Gandhi was defeated. Even after the defeat, the KGB kept up its efforts to revive Indira’s faction of Congress (I) with more communist participation. For this a KGB agent under cover as Trud correspondent got into touch with her. Massive amount of funding was funnelled into various fronts floated by Congress (I) at the behest of the KGB. When Indira returned to power in 1980, she tried to renew her contact with a KGB operative Cherepakhin.

Whether Indira Gandhi was directly a KGB recruit and a Soviet spy is not clear from the available evidence as of now and may never be exactly known; but what is clear is that she received funds from dubious sources, floated many fronts for that specific purpose and many of her closest advisors and ministers were either KGB recruits or worked in collusion with them. Regarding the closeness of these Soviet recruits to her it is hard to believe that she did not know that they were foreign spies.

Even though, Indira Gandhi was not directly a Soviet spy, she did not care if the money to run her party came from the KGB. Neither did she care that in return the communists virtually made a coup of the entire nation and occupied every important position in all political, academic, judicial, executive and media institutions of the country.

Like, Christopher Andrews said: “The entire country was up for sale”, and Indira Gandhi sold it to the communists.

So tell me, doesn’t it seem plausible that Shastri was murdered in this light? Nehru had sold the country to communists and to China. Indira Gandhi had been groomed to be the next sold Prime Minister, but Shastri spoiled all the plans. Wasn’t it imperative to eliminate him?

SourceNew Delhi
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

News

DGCA extends suspension of international flights

The DGCA circular mentioned that the suspension does not affect the operation of international all-cargo operations and flights specifically approved by it

NIA raids locations across Kashmir in terror-funding case

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) on 28 October conducted raids at multiple locations in Srinagar, including the office of Greater Kashmir newspaper and the...
- Advertisement -

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -
%d bloggers like this: