Harbans case explains delay in hanging Nirbhaya’s tormentors

The case Harbans Singh vs Uttar Pradesh began in 1977 and concluded in 1982, confounding the Supreme Court as to what sentence the third convict deserved

Editorials

ISRO Too Competent To Need Society’s Immature Reaction

Three days have passed since Lander Vikram strayed from the planned trajectory; the nation is still trying to motivate ISRO scientists as if they were in a state of despondency, notwithstanding their 95% success in meeting the Chandrayaan-2 mission objectives

Pandits’ Return Will Be Real Normalcy In Kashmir

The opposition and media would have the world believe that not persecuted Pandits getting their home and hearth back but terrorists conveniently using internet, bombs and bullets would qualify as normalcy in the Valley

Muslim Women Act Proves Modi Can If He Wants To

The passing of the Muslim Women Bill in the Rajya Sabha, which has established BJP's floor management prowess, must wake Hindus and the middle class up to pressure PM Narendra Modi to legislate what they have been demanding for ages
Narad
Naradhttps://www.sirfnews.com
A profile to publish the works of established writers, authors, columnists or people in positions of authority who would like to stay anonymous while expressing their views on Sirf News
- Advertisement -

In the case of Nirbhaya, who was gang-raped and tortured in a way that led to her death, after the announcement of the death sentence of the convicts, the lay got an impression that justice was delayed but not denied. But the date of executing the convicts on death row still changed from 22 January to 1 February. A case referred to as Harbans Singh versus Uttar Pradesh that began in 1977 and concluded in 1982 may help explain why the judiciary is delaying what appears inevitable.

But whatever be the reasons of jurisprudence, it is understandable that Nirbhaya’s mother Asha Devi has vented her anger on the “attempt to save the culprits” from hanging, which the highest court of the country had ordered long ago. Technically, nobody is trying to save the four convicts. But long ago, the Supreme Court had decided that unless all the guilty of a given case of crime exhaust all their legal options, none will be hanged. In the event of the president rejecting the clemency plea of each or otherwise, the same punishment will be accorded to all.

The case of Nirbhaya cannot be compared to that of Yakub Memon who had appealed to the court even after the rejection of his plea for a presidential pardon. Here, more than one convict for the given crime are to be executed to their punishment is going to be commuted to life imprisonment whereas Memon’s crime was unique and his accomplices had not been held guilty under the same sections.

As yet in the case of Nirbhaya, the president has rejected Mukesh Singh’s clemency plea. The other three convicts have not yet appealed for clemency. The Supreme Court has dismissed the curative petitions of two convicts: Mukesh and Vinay. Two other convicts have not exhausted this option.

Law experts say there is no law on whether in cases like Nirbhaya’s all convicts found guilty of the same crime must be executed together. However, in a 1982 judgment, the Supreme Court held that if all the convicts had been punished for the same crime, all of them should be hanged together.

In the case Harbans Singh vs Uttar Pradesh, the three guilty were convicted of killing four people in 1977. This case went from the lower court to the Supreme Court. All the convicts filed appeals at different times.

The Supreme Court upheld the death sentence of one of the convicts; he was hanged. When the second convict moved the apex court, the hearing went to a separate bench that changed his death sentence to life imprisonment. When the third convict Harbans Singh reached the highest court, his plea was dismissed. Later, the president of the time rejected his clemency plea too. When the convict reached the Supreme Court again, he asked how could three people guilty of one given crime be punished differently wherein one convict had been hanged and another had been imprisoned for life.

The Supreme Court admitted there was a mistake somewhere. But the convict who had been hanged could not be made to live again. The court then decided to be extra cautious in awarding death sentences to a bunch of convicts.

The Supreme Court did not pronounce a sentence against Harbans Singh. It requested the president to consider his clemency plea. Since then, a group held guilty for a given crime are not hanged one by one. The criminal justice system waits until the entire bunch exhausts all legal options. Then they are hanged on one day.

- Advertisement -

More reports

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

- Advertisement -

Articles

BJP Could Not Have Won With This Approach To Delhi

From not paying attention to the corruption-ridden MCD to aloof leaders whose houses witnessed no activity during campaigns, BJP went all wrong in the Delhi assembly election

AAP Win In Delhi Was Foregone Conclusion: 5 Reasons

The five factors that contributed to the AAP victory have been arranged in the decreasing order of relevance; the first three will remain constant for a few more Delhi elections

Rahul Gandhi’s Intemperance Costs INC Dear Again

After forfeiting the Delhi poll with his 'danda mārenge' comment, the politician who has pledged never to grow up must put both his feet permanently in the mouth to gag himself

Bloomberg For US President? Why Not?

Mayor Michael Bloomberg can be an attractive candidate to a lot of voters – those who are concerned about the leftward, idiosyncratic, wokey, “let us butt into every other country’s internal policy initiatives” overreach of the Democrats

‘सभी संगठनों से मुक्त’ जामिया शूटर ‘बजरंग दल’ का कैसे हो गया?

जामिया क्षेत्र में गोली चलाने से पहले 'रामभक्त गोपाल' ने अपनी प्रोफ़ाइल बदली और धड़ल्ले से दक्षिणपंथी संगठनों व एक पार्टी के नाम दर्ज कर दिए

30 साल से ज़िन्दगी तलाशते कश्मीरी हिन्दू

मस्जिदों से हिन्दुओ के सफाए के पैगाम आए; एक के बाद एक दिल दहलाने वाली खबर आई; जुमे की नमाज़ के बाद सड़को पर जो भी हिन्दू दिखा, काट दिया गया

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this: