22 C
New Delhi
Monday 6 April 2020

Allahabad HC to examine petition against Modi’s election

Yadav has filed the election petition, alleging his nomination paper was wrongly rejected by the returning officer

Editorials

In India

Power Grid says fear of tripping at 9:09 PM on 5 April baseless

Once the Ministry of Power made its statement, the critics cut a sorry figure, with politicians asking why the prime minister's statements call for clarifications and 'experts' saying this was avoidable

Terrorist links of Tablighi Jamaat include Masood Azhar, Osama bin Laden

Maulana Masood Azhar, the founder of the terrorist group Harkat ul Mujahideen which underwent several name changes to finally become Jaish-e-Mohammed, is not only a member of the Tablighi Jamaat but also a once close associate of Osama bin Laden

Allahabad: The Allahabad High Court on Wednesday decided to examine next month if a petition challenging the election of Prime Minister Narendra Modi from the Varanasi Lok Sabha seat is worth hearing at all.

A bench of Justice MK Gupta slated September 4 to hear arguments on the maintainability of the the election petition, filed by former Border Security Force soldier Tej Prakash Yadav.

Yadav had filed his nomination paper as Samajwadi Party candidate from Varanasi parliamentary seat, but had failed to contest the election as his papers were rejected by the returning officer.

Appearing for Prime Minister Modi, Additional Solicitor General Satpal Jain argued before the court that the election petition was not maintainable under order 7 rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code as well as section 86 of the Representation of the People Act.

Order 7, rule 11 of the CPC enlists “non-disclosure of a proper cause of action” in the plaint to a court as one of the grounds to reject it.

Accordingly, Jain submitted to the court that the plaint against the prime minister should be dismissed because it discloses no valid ground for filing it.

The law officer also sought dismissal of the petition under the provisions of section 86, saying it does not even allege any electoral malpractice by the candidate winning the Varanasi Lok Sabha seat.

The court, however, fixed 4 September to hear the question of petition’s maintainability in detail.

Yadav’s nomination paper to fight the Lok Sabha election from Varanasi was rejected by the district returning officer on 1 May following his failure to submit a certificate testifying that he was not sacked for either corruption or disloyalty.

Yadav has filed the election petition, alleging his nomination paper was wrongly rejected by the returning officer.

As a result of the rejection of his nomination paper, he was not able to contest the Lok Sabha election from Varanasi against Prime Minister Modi, which, he said, was his constitutional right.

He has requested the court to declare the prime minister’s election from Varanasi as null and void.

Coronavirus worldwide update, with focus on India, LIVE

Since the facts and figures related to the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (nCOVID-19, COVID-19 or COVID) are changing by the minute, Sirf News has begun this blog to keep the readers updated with information coming from authentic sources

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

- Advertisement -

Articles

China Is Guilty, But How Will World Retaliate?

The attack has to be calibrated as the world has invested heavily in China and that country, in turn, has markets worldwide, making your own economy vulnerable when you take measures against Beijing

Sewa In COVID Times: Living ‘Service Before Self’ Credo

Sewa International volunteers were first off the starting block, setting up non-medical helplines for the four regional areas — West Coast, East Coast, Midwest, and Southwest — for a coordinated national response, where people can call in for assistance

India And US: Same COVID, Different Prescriptions

The different social structures, experiences in the leaders of the two countries, variation in the degree of political capital, etc make India and the US react differently to the global COVID pandemic

China Is Guilty, But How Will World Retaliate?

The attack has to be calibrated as the world has invested heavily in China and that country, in turn, has markets worldwide, making your own economy vulnerable when you take measures against Beijing

Sewa In COVID Times: Living ‘Service Before Self’ Credo

Sewa International volunteers were first off the starting block, setting up non-medical helplines for the four regional areas — West Coast, East Coast, Midwest, and Southwest — for a coordinated national response, where people can call in for assistance

India And US: Same COVID, Different Prescriptions

The different social structures, experiences in the leaders of the two countries, variation in the degree of political capital, etc make India and the US react differently to the global COVID pandemic

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this: