Thursday 9 December 2021
- Advertisement -
HomePoliticsWorldDid Pompeo troll China, tweeting his dog's assault on Winnie the Pooh?

Did Pompeo troll China, tweeting his dog’s assault on Winnie the Pooh?

Us Secretary of State Michael (Mike) Pompeo verbally attacks China almost every day, but one of his tweets today set tongues wagging, as many interpreted his dog tearing with joy a toy Winnie the Pooh was a caustic message to Beijing.

“Mercer and all of her favorite toys!” a canine-loving Pompeo tweeted from his personal account.

But the Chinese can hardly complain. Their social media users have frequently used the jolly bear as a meme for President Xi Jinping. They cannot dare mock their own president due to the lack of democracy and freedom of expression under the regime of the Communist Party of China (CCP).

Asked in an interview on 15 July whether this was “Winnie the Pooh-gate,” Pompeo dodged. “No, I imagine there were a series of stuffed animals, and they were equally distributed for Mercer’s benefit,” Pompeo told Iowa conservative radio host Simon Conway.

When told that the BBC had run a story musing about a deeper meaning, Pompeo laughed and said, “I hadn’t seen that.”

The comparisons between Xi and ‘Winnie The Pooh’ began in 2013, when he visited US President Barack Obama. During the visit, an image of Xi and Obama walking together spurred comparisons to a rotund Winnie (Xi) and a lanky Tigger (Obama), another character from the cartoon series.

That was not all. In 2014, media again compared Xi to the character. It happened during a  with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. They compared Abe to the gloomy donkey character from the series Eeyore and Xi to the yellow bear.

China has since sought to scrub the meme from the social mediums accessible inside the country. Beijing in 2018 rejected the release of the Disney film Christopher Robin, which stars Winnie.

Pompeo has championed a hard line against China, criticizing the communist leadership for denying free expression, clamping down in Hong Kong and failing to stop the COVID pandemic.

113 views

Sirf News needs to recruit journalists in large numbers to increase the volume of its reports and articles to at least 100 a day, which will make us mainstream, which is necessary to challenge the anti-India discourse by established media houses. Besides there are monthly liabilities like the subscription fees of news agencies, the cost of a dedicated server, office maintenance, marketing expenses, etc. Donation is our only source of income. Please serve the cause of the nation by donating generously.

Support pro-India journalism by donating

via UPI to surajit.dasgupta@icici or

via PayTM to 9650444033@paytm

via Phone Pe to 9650444033@ibl

via Google Pay to dasgupta.surajit@okicici

Why Aren't Thousands of Gigabytes of Abusive Images Removed from the Web? https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/sexual-violence-against-children-why-aren-t-thousands-of-gigabytes-of-abusive-images-removed-from-the-web-a-99f36312-8054-479b-8d7c-ff86679daa45

Brazen move to openly legitimize manufactured consent. What is stopping the self-appointed guardians of a new moral code choose journalists who can further the causes the US believes are ‘appropriate’ for other nations? These scribes won’t be ‘independent’ after all, will they? https://twitter.com/cnni/status/1468686900605210628

CNN International@cnni

The US will provide new funding to protect reporters targeted because of their work and support independent international journalism, Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Monday at the opening of the virtual Summit for Democracy.
https://cnn.it/33hmAPb

Ahead of the #SummitforDemocracy, I announced @USAID’s new Combating Transnational Corruption Grand Challenge, which will engage partners & problem-solvers from around the globe, utilizing every tool at our disposal to fight transnational corruption. More: https://www.usaid.gov/news-information/speeches/dec-7-2021-administrator-power-summit-democracy-event-all-hands-on-deck

Some 10y ago I have concluded that hysterical bellicosity of liberals ("permanent war for permanent peace") cannot be explained by ideology but rather by psychology and self-interest.

1 Need to convince others of own virtue by permanently finding the objects of evil and vice which then justify hatred,
2 Lack of responsibility: while wars go on, they can continue w/ dinner parties, vacation, children's exhibitions etc. as before.

Read further:

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

- Advertisment -

Now

Columns

[prisna-google-website-translator]
%d bloggers like this: