27.9 C
New Delhi
Tuesday 7 April 2020

Citizenship Amendment Bill: 7 points disturbing opposition

Whereas Shashi Tharoor says that the Citizenship Amendment Bill is in contravention of the idea of India, Amit Shah compares it to an ideological reform like the virtual scrapping of Article 370

Editorials

In India

Lockdown to end on schedule, hints PM; list 10 KRAs, union ministers told

Today's meeting of the prime minister with his colleagues in the union ministries raises hope for the economy even amid the apprehension that the nation might not be able to break the chain of the COVID contagion by 14 April

Terrorist links of Tablighi Jamaat include Masood Azhar, Osama bin Laden

Maulana Masood Azhar, the founder of the terrorist group Harkat ul Mujahideen which underwent several name changes to finally become Jaish-e-Mohammed, is not only a member of the Tablighi Jamaat but also a once close associate of Osama bin Laden

The Union Cabinet on Wednesday approved the Citizenship Amendment Bill 2019. It will now be introduced in Parliament only to see the opposition resist it tooth-and-nail. While the general impression is that the NRC is supposed to merely tell who is a citizen of the country and who is not, if a non-Muslim is excluded from the National Citizens Register, the Citizenship Amendment Bill will protect him/her, there is more to the opposition to this change in the law that would define who is an Indian.

1. Citizenship basis: Religion

The Bill provides for the granting of citizenship of India to non-Muslim refugees (Hindu, Jain, Buddhist, Sikh, Parsi and Christian community) victims of religious persecution in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. The Citizenship Act 1955 is proposed to be amended under the Civil Amendment Bill 2019.

Through this change, citizenship will be given to those non-Muslim refugees who have been living in India for the past one year to six years.

2. Exemption from citizenship clause

States, where Inner Line Permit (ILP) is in force and six Scheduled Tribe Areas in four States of the Northeast, are exempted from the Citizenship Amendment Bill.

3. Relaxation in the citizenship rule

Presently, the period of acquiring citizenship under the Citizenship Act 1955 applicable in India is 11 years. The period for acquiring citizenship has to be relaxed from one year to six years under this rule.

4. Reduced time

Through this bill of 2019, refugees of Hindu, Jain, Buddhist, Sikh, Parsi and Christian communities of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan will get citizenship of India in one to six years instead of 11 years.

5. Illegal to legal

According to the law of 1955, illegal migrants cannot get citizenship of India. In this, people who have entered India without valid travel documents like passports and visas or have stayed there for more than the mentioned period are considered illegal migrants.

6. No incarceration or deportation

Illegal migrants may be imprisoned or sent back to their countries. But, through the bill of 2019, the central government has changed the old laws and exempted Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan.

7. Excluded Muslims won’t be jailed or deported either

Under the Citizenship Amendment Bill 2019, if non-Muslim refugees are found in India without valid documents, they will not be sent to jail nor will they be deported.

Tharoor vs Sarma

The opposition alleges that Muslims are being targeted through this bill. The bill violates Article 14 of the Constitution which talks about the right to equality, they say. INC leader Shashi Tharoor said on Wednesday that this undermines the fundamental principles of the Constitution.

Tharoor said that this bill was unconstitutional as it violated the basic idea of India. On the other hand, organisations in the Northeast say that if the Citizenship Amendment Bill is implemented, it will threaten the identity of the indigenous people in the region and threaten their livelihood.

Meanwhile, Assam Finance Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has claimed that the confusion over the bill has been removed. For the past few days, the Union Home Minister Amit Shah has bees trying to clear the confusion by holding various meetings with various stakeholders for 100 hours on the issue of the bill. The government says this bill as historic. The government compares the bill ideologically to the removal of Article 370. This is the reason Union minister Rajnath Singh asked all the MPs when the Home Minister Amit Shah would present the bill in Parliament, all the MPs of the BJP should be present in the House.

The Citizenship Amendment Bill 2019 was introduced in the Lok Sabha on 19 July 2016. On 12 August 2016, the bill was referred to a joint parliamentary committee.

The bill was passed in the Lok Sabha on January 2019 after the report of the committee. However, it could not be introduced in the Rajya Sabha.

Coronavirus worldwide update, with focus on India, LIVE

Since the facts and figures related to the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (nCOVID-19, COVID-19 or COVID) are changing by the minute, Sirf News has begun this blog to keep the readers updated with information coming from authentic sources

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

- Advertisement -

Articles

China Is Guilty, But How Will World Retaliate?

The attack has to be calibrated as the world has invested heavily in China and that country, in turn, has markets worldwide, making your own economy vulnerable when you take measures against Beijing

Sewa In COVID Times: Living ‘Service Before Self’ Credo

Sewa International volunteers were first off the starting block, setting up non-medical helplines for the four regional areas — West Coast, East Coast, Midwest, and Southwest — for a coordinated national response, where people can call in for assistance

United States & India: Same COVID, Different Prescriptions

The different social structures, experiences in the leaders of the two countries, variation in the degree of political capital, etc make India and the US react differently to the global COVID pandemic

China Is Guilty, But How Will World Retaliate?

The attack has to be calibrated as the world has invested heavily in China and that country, in turn, has markets worldwide, making your own economy vulnerable when you take measures against Beijing

Sewa In COVID Times: Living ‘Service Before Self’ Credo

Sewa International volunteers were first off the starting block, setting up non-medical helplines for the four regional areas — West Coast, East Coast, Midwest, and Southwest — for a coordinated national response, where people can call in for assistance

United States & India: Same COVID, Different Prescriptions

The different social structures, experiences in the leaders of the two countries, variation in the degree of political capital, etc make India and the US react differently to the global COVID pandemic

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this: