23 C
New Delhi
Friday 6 December 2019
India Crime Chidambaram can't be cornered by ED, it seems

Chidambaram can’t be cornered by ED, it seems

Singhvi, on Tuesday, told the Supreme Court that the ED had tripped up by alleging Chidambaram for a case that took place in 2007-2008 under provisions of the law that were apprised as an offence only in 2009

New Delhi: Federal investigating agency, the Enforcement Directorate has been under constant attack by the legal team of former Finance Minister P Chidambaram. The Enforcement Directorate that intends to arrest him in the INX Media money laundering  case has been challenged by senior lawyer Abhishek Singhvi, who is representing Chidambaram along with Kapil Sibal.

Singhvi, on Tuesday, told the Supreme Court that the ED had tripped up by alleging Chidambaram for a case that took place in 2007-2008 under provisions of the law that were apprised as an offence only in 2009.

“The Sections charged in the FIR were declared offences only in June 2009 through notification of the amendment of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, one year after the alleged acts took place,” Singhvi told a bench led by Justice R Banumathi.

Referring to the Delhi High Court order that rejected the request for pre-arrest bail of Chidambaram, Singhvi, who is also a senior Congress leader, said, “A person is being “painted as a kingpin” of an alleged offence which did not exist as an offence at the time it was committed.” The order in which the judge had termed Chidambaram the kingpin of the scandal was criticized strongly by the former minister’s team.

Chidambaram is accused by the ED for creating “layers of money laundering web in a manner which is sufficient to make it difficult for law enforcement agencies to track the money trail of proceeds of crime”. In 2007, there were irregularities in the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) in the clearance given for foreign investment to the INX Media group. Chidambaram was the finance minister during this period.

A First Information Report was registered by the CBI against Chidambaram on 15 May 2017, alleging irregularities to the tune of Rs 350 crore in the clearance that had been awarded. Later, a money-laundering case was filed by the ED.

Singhvi argued that the offences invoked by the ED were wrong since money laundering wasn’t a part of the law when the crime is alleged to have taken place.

An application has been filed by Chidambaram’s legal team to ask the judges to order the ED to produce the transcript of the former minister’s questioning that was held in December 2018 and January 2019.

“The agency cannot randomly place documents in the court and “behind the back” to seek Chidambaram’s custody,” Kapil Sibal argued.

Singhvi, questioning the credit of the high court order on pre-arrest bail, emphasized that the judge had rejected the bail as the response of the Congress biggie had been elusive for the gravity of the offence.

The judge had a distorted idea of a suspect being elusive, said Singhvi, who also added that a person being investigated by the agencies is “not obliged to give the answers the agencies want to hear”. Giving an answer to the questions put to him is sufficient enough, according to the lawyer.

Subscribe to our newsletter

You will get all our latest news and articles via email when you subscribe

The email despatches will be non-commercial in nature
Disputes, if any, subject to jurisdiction in New Delhi

Leave a Reply

Opinion

Trump Drives Democrats And Media Crazy

America can never be the same again, even after Trump leaves the White House,” say many, and you can read that anywhere

Balasaheb Thackeray’s Legacy Up For Grabs

The Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena has failed to live up to the ideals of Balasaheb, leaving a void that the BJP alone can fill

How BJP Pulled Off Maha Coup With Nobody Watching

As Devendra Fadnavis desisted from contradicting Uddhav Thackeray everyday, the media attention moved from the BJP to its noisy rivals

Anil Ambani: From Status Of Tycoon To Insolvency

Study the career of Anil Ambani, and you will get a classic case of decisions you ought not take as a businessman and time you better utilise

तवलीन सिंह, यह कैसा स्वाभिमान?

‘जिस मोदी सरकार का पांच साल सपोर्ट किया उसी ने मेरे बेटे को देश निकाला दे दिया,’ तवलीन सिंह ने लिखा। क्या आपने किसी क़ीमत के बदले समर्थन किया?
- Advertisement -

Elsewhere

Nirav declared 2nd fugitive economic offender

Nirav Modi, fighting his extradition case in England, was further remanded, unable to convince the court he wouldn't intimidate witnesses

RBI policy rates intact; SBI disapproves status quo

The 6-member MPC headed by the RBI governor unanimously decided to maintain the repo rate at 5.15% and the reverse repo rate at 4.90%

Parliament canteen to stop offering subsidised food

The Narendra Modi government had been reducing the subsidy for food at the Parliament canteen gradually since 2016; it will now be eliminated

Burnt body found again: Bengal after Telangana, Bihar, UP

Bengal Police confirmed that the woman was burnt and killed on 4 December in Malda while they could confirm rape after the autopsy report

Citizenship, Dabholkar, Bhima-Koregaon divide Maha govt

The INC not only disagrees with the Shiv Sena on the Citizenship Amendment Bill but also questions the NCP for the Bhima-Koregaon riots

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this:
Skip to toolbar