Friday 27 May 2022
- Advertisement -

Boris Becker could face deportation from UK

The Home Office of the UK may claim that the criminal offences of Boris Becker continued after the Brexit withdrawal agreement was implemented on 31 December 2020

Join Sirf News on

and/or

The Home Office of the United Kingdom has confirmed that tennis veteran Boris Becker will be considered for deportation. Observers say the potential battle could set a legal precedent and Becker may have to represent himself in court if he wants to remain in the UK.

Last week, the former tennis star from Germany was jailed for two years and six months for hiding millions of pounds’ worth of assets after being made bankrupt in June 2017. Sentenced under the Insolvency Act of the UK, Becker will serve half the full prison term.

A Home Office spokesperson said that while it did not routinely comment on individual cases, “any foreign national who is convicted of a and given a prison is considered for deportation at the earliest opportunity”.

Such a turn of events is likely to make case history because the Home Office may claim that Becker’s criminal offences continued after the withdrawal agreement was implemented on 31 December 2020, which made immigration law for citizens more stringent.

This lack of clarity means Becker, who is not thought to have taken British citizenship, could either be considered for deportation under the previous, more relaxed version of the UK Borders Act 2007, or the updated version, which was implemented on 31 December 2020.

Fighting against it could up to £ 30,000, experts said, meaning Becker may have to represent himself in court as a litigant in person.

“If the criminal conduct took place after 31 December 2020 then Becker is subject to automatic deportation because he received a of 12 months or more,” said Colin Yeo, an immigration barrister and author of Welcome to Britain: Fixing Our Broken Immigration System. “He could attempt to resist deportation on human rights grounds but we have seen young black men who have lived in the UK far longer than Becker, sometimes since early childhood, deported for lower sentences than Becker received.

“If the conduct took place before that date, he from the protection of the -UK withdrawal agreement. He would still be considered for deportation and the Home Office would be likely to attempt to deport him but he’d have a stronger legal case for staying.”

A consultant solicitor in immigration and asylum law for DG Legal, Christopher Cole said the case of Becker was the first one he had seen that would test the new legal landscape. “It’s uncharted territory: I’m not aware of any cases like this one, where the courts have had to decide which side of the dividing line the offending behaviour occurred,” he said.

If the court decides the offending behaviour continued until Becker’s sentencing last week, the home secretary is likely to press on with an attempt to deport him, said Cole.

“More often than not, because of the political pressure on the Home Office, wherever possible they will try to make a decision to deport any foreign national offender even if it looks like they’ve got a fairly weak case and there’s a very high chance of that person succeeding on appeal,” said Cole. “Even if they think they’re almost bound to lose, more often than not they will make a decision to deport and that would then lead to an appeal to the tribunal.”

In this case, Becker will either have to find up to £ 30,000 or represent himself as a litigant in person, he added.

Zeena Luchowa, a senior solicitor at Laura Devine Immigration and member of the Law Society’s immigration committee, said if Becker’s conduct was deemed to have been committed after 31 December 2020, deportation can be made if deemed “conducive to the public good”. “This gives discretion to the Home Office to act in a way that reflects the public interest – and given Home Office’s position on criminality when it comes to foreign nationals they are unlikely to let this one go.”

She said Becker could appeal on human rights grounds or an could be made for the deportation order to be revoked if compassionate circumstances were found.

However, appeals can typically take six to 12 months to be processed and are very expensive, said Leon Glenister, a barrister at Landmark Chambers. “The presumption is that he will receive a deportation order but although one has to consider his right to a private and family life, I can’t see that is going to give him much hope.

“Even if Becker goes to a high street lawyer to defend him, costs can reach £30,000. The only other option is for him to represent himself as a litigant in person. This is not unheard of but it can be quite complicated, so it’s not advised.”

Contribute to our cause

Contribute to the nation's cause

Sirf News needs to recruit journalists in large numbers to increase the volume of its reports and articles to at least 100 a day, which will make us mainstream, which is necessary to challenge the anti-India discourse by established media houses. Besides there are monthly liabilities like the subscription fees of news agencies, the cost of a dedicated server, office maintenance, marketing expenses, etc. Donation is our only source of income. Please serve the cause of the nation by donating generously.

Join Sirf News on

and/or

Similar Articles

Comments

Scan to donate

Swadharma QR Code
Advertisment
Sirf News Facebook Page QR Code
Facebook page of Sirf News: Scan to like and follow

Most Popular

[prisna-google-website-translator]
%d bloggers like this: