22 C
New Delhi
Wednesday 13 November 2019
India Dhavan quotes Iqbal (1877-1938) to prove Babur (1483-1530) 'revered...

Dhavan quotes Iqbal (1877-1938) to prove Babur (1483-1530) ‘revered Lord Rama’

Claiming that Babur was not a destroyer although Mir Baqi had built the mosque at the behest of the conqueror and on the orders of a Sufi, Rajeev Dhavan, a senior advocate representing the Muslim side in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute, cited a famous line of Muhammad Iqbal who lived about four centuries after the advent of Mughals in India

-

- Advertisment -

Subscribe to our newsletter

You will get all our latest news and articles via email when you subscribe

The email despatches will be non-commercial in nature
Disputes, if any, subject to jurisdiction in New Delhi

The Supreme Court today set a new deadline to complete the Ayodhya case hearing. The apex court asked all the parties to the dispute to complete the debate by 17 October. Earlier, the Supreme Court had set the date of 18 October to complete the debate. Hearing in the case continued in the Supreme Court for the 37th day. On Friday, senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan started his arguments on behalf of the Muslim side.

Justice Bobde asked whether divinity was imposed on anything in Islam. To this, the Muslim side said that this happened in both religions and that the mosque was an example of this in Islam.

Justice Bobde said that one always heard that there was nothing like this; “you worship Allah and not any thing“; we want to see if any institution has considered the mosque to be revered because one comes there only to worship Allah”.

Dhavan said that the Hindu parties accused Babur of breaking the temple and building a mosque, but Babur was not a destroyer. The mosque was built by Mir Baqi at the behest of a Sufi, the lawyer claimed. Dhavan read out a famous line Allama Mohammed Iqbal in support of his claim: ‘Hai Ram ke wajūd par Hindostan ko nāz; ahl-e-nazar samajhte hain us ko Imam-e-Hind (India is proud of the existence of Rama; those with the right vision regard him as the imam of India),’ much as Iqbal lived on this earth centuries after both Babur and Mir Baqi were gone.

During the hearing, Justice Chandrachud asked whether there was any evidence that Babur had given any financial aid to Babri Masjid? Dhavan denied that there was any kind of evidence thereof. He said that the evidence of the temple claimants did not exist either.

Muslims were compensated after the attack on the mosque: Dhavan

Dhavan said that in 1855, a Nihang came to the plot now disputed and he worshipped Guru Govind Singh there and marked it thus. However, everything was removed later. The British governor-general and Faizabad deputy commissioner had given rent-free villages for maintenance of the mosque and then revenue villages as per Babur’s decree, Dhavan claimed. Due to financial support, the other party’s adversity position could not be achieved, the advocate for the Muslim side said.

The Nirmohi Akhara, one of the Hindu parties to the dispute, however, claims that the Nihang Dhavan referred to was a member of their order and that he had worshipped Lord Rama at the spot. This, in fact, is among the prime reasons that make them a claimant of the site in Ayodhya.

Dhavan said that after a previous attack on the mosque in the year 1934, compensation was given to the Muslims to make up for the loss. On 10 December 1884, a Bairagi Fakir entered the mosque building and sat down. When he did not come out despite the administration’s warning, he was forcibly removed and his flag was also uprooted, Dhavan said.

The advancing of the date implies that there are only four days of hearing left in the case.

Previously, on Thursday, the Hindu side had placed its arguments in the Supreme Court. The counsel was presented first by Ram Lalla Virajman’s lawyer; then by Nirmohi Akhara and later by Gopal Singh Visharad.

Advocate Sushil Jain started the debate on behalf of Nirmohi Akhara. He told the court that now this hearing has become like a T20 match. The court expressed displeasure over his comment. Also said that you were given four and a half days. Now you have to answer, so now you are saying 20-20? So was your last argument a test match?

Leave a Reply

Opinion

Guru Nanak Jayanti: What First Sikh Guru Taught

While Guru Nanak urged people to 'nām japo, kirat karo, vand chhako', he stood for several values while he also fought various social evils

Muhammed Who Inconvenienced Muslims

Archaeologist KK Muhammed had earlier got on the nerves of the leftist intelligentsia for exposing their nexus with Islamic extremists

UCC Now, Rajnath Hints: Here’s How Modi Can Do It

Modi can argue in a manner to make UCC look secular and pro-Hindu at the same time, making a Muslim or Christian counterargument impossible

Tulasi: Two Stories, One Reason For Devotion

The Padma Purana, Devi Bhagavatam and Skanda Purana tell the story of Tulasi or Vrinda differently but the essence of devotion is a constant

BJP Cannot Afford Ideological Confusion

Being everything to everybody is Congress, which now faces doom. Socialism, secularism and 'sabka vishwas' are pushing BJP down the same path.
- Advertisement -

Elsewhere

Guru Nanak Jayanti: What First Sikh Guru Taught

While Guru Nanak urged people to 'nām japo, kirat karo, vand chhako', he stood for several values while he also fought various social evils

Kajal of India reaps ‘reward’ of marrying a Pakistani

The case of Kajal differs from love jihad stories: a country rather than an individual has dashed her hopes, but there is a similarity, too

Congress to help in Maha’ govt formation under 5 conditions

They just begin with not letting a Thackeray be the chief minister, but even otherwise, Congress and NCP leaders are not getting along well

Jharkhand BJP haunted by Maharashtra alliance woes?

A BJP source said that the outcome of Maharashtra affected the party's Jharkhand policy where it refused to give 'winnable' seats away

Industrial production at 8-year low in September

Most industrial groups registered negative growth rates in the period, reminiscent of 2011-12 when manufacturing had gone into a tailspin

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this: