Friday 27 January 2023
- Advertisement -
PoliticsIndiaTrump 'making up' case, attorney of porn star accuses

Trump ‘making up’ case, attorney of porn star accuses

Michael Avenatti, represents Daniels who claims that she had an intimate relationship with Trump years before he was elected president

Washington: An attorney for adult film star Stormy Daniels on Monday alleged that President Donald Trump and his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani are now “making up” the case in their favour and that they have lost track of the truth.

Michael Avenatti represents Daniels who claims that she had had an intimate relationship with Trump years before he was elected president. And days before the 2016 presidential election, she says she received $130,000 from Trump’s then personal attorney Michael Cohen to not go public about her relationship with the president.

In the last few days, Trump has acknowledged that he reimbursed Cohen for the $130,000 he paid to Daniels.

Avenatti said there is ample evidence to prove that Cohen had approached Daniels before the election to keep her mouth shut. The money being given to Daniels was part of the campaign finance, he asserted, which has been denied by Giuliani who is now the personal attorney for Trump.

“There is a significant amount of evidence, there is no question that this had everything to do with the campaign. In fact, if you go back and replay that interview, and that will be done I’m confident, and if you look at the answers, you’re going to find an inconsistency with what Rudy Giuliani just told you,” Avenatti told ABC News in an interview.

“Early in the interview, he told you it has nothing to do with the campaign, later in the interview you asked him if there was going to be inconsistencies between Michael Cohen’s testimony and Donald Trump and he equivocated. He basically said that well it may have had something to do with the campaign, but it also has to do with personal issues. There’s no question this had everything to do with the campaign. You could look at the timing associated with the payment,” he said.

Avenatti claimed that Trump and Giuliani are now making up things.

“It’s an absolute unmitigated disaster for Rudy Giuliani and the president. It’s a train wreck. I can’t believe that that actually just happened. I mean what we witnessed by Rudy Giuliani may be one of the worst TV appearances by any attorney on behalf of a client in modern times,” he said.

“He now expects the American people to believe that he doesn’t really know the facts, that as to every key question you asked, he hasn’t communicated with the president about it. I mean this guy’s all over the map over the last 72 hours on some very simple facts that should be very straightforward,” Avenatti said.

“I think it is obvious to the American people that this is a cover-up, that they are making it up as they go along, they don’t know what to say because they’ve lost track of the truth,” said the attorney for Daniels.

Avenatti said that Daniels did not approach Cohen, it was the other way round.

“My client was preparing to tell her story, my client did not approach Michael Cohen, did not have anyone approach Michael Cohen, Michael Cohen approached my client in her council in an effort to shut her up in the days before the election,” he said, asserting that he can prove that.

“We have evidence that the president knew in the months at least following the campaign, of this payment, certainly knew it long before his statement on Air Force One in April of this year where he effectively stood there and lied to the American people about not knowing anything about this payment. And then, of course, Rudy Giuliani a few days ago goes out and contradicts that,” he said.

[pullquote]’Cohen made payments for the president, or he conducted business for the president, which means he had legal fees, monies laid out and expenditures, which I have on my bills to my clients,’ Giuliani said[/pullquote]

Meanwhile, Trump’s former personal attorney could have made payments to women other than adult film star Stormy Daniels if “necessary”, his new lawyer Rudy Giuliani said today.

Appearing on a Sunday talk show, Giuliani exuded confidence that Trump would come out clean on the issue and this is unlikely to affect his presidency.

Former New York mayor Giuliani succeeded Michael Cohen as the new personal attorney for Trump.

“I have no knowledge of that but I would think if it was necessary, yes,” Giuliani told ABC News in an interview. He was asked if Cohen made payments to other women for Trump.

“He (Cohen) made payments for the president, or he conducted business for the president, which means he had legal fees, monies laid out and expenditures, which I have on my bills to my clients,” Giuliani said.

“Are you confident that his testimony and the Stormy Daniels payment won’t contradict the president?” he was asked.

“Not in any material respect. If it didn’t contradict it at all, then somebody would be lying. I remember that great cross-examination when the person just repeated the things over and over again the same way. Of course, there’ll be minor details,” he noted.

“On the two main facts, was it for another purpose other than just campaign, even if it was a campaign? Yes. It was to settle a personal issue that would be embarrassing to him and his wife. Number two, did he repay it over a period of time and then find out ultimately what it was about? Yes,” Giuliani said.

“I’m comfortable with that. That’s 100 percent. That’s why these people who think they’re chasing this down are involved in the same witch hunt that Judge Ellis was so concerned about with (ex-FBI director) Robert Mueller,” he said.

During the interview, Giuliani said that people do not go away with USD 130,000 for a meritorious claim. Days before the presidential elections, Daniels received USD 130,000 from Trump’s personal attorney Cohen so as not to go public with her alleged intimate with Trump years ago.

Giuliani did not deny an old picture of Trump and Daniels appearing in the media but appeared to have strongly refuted the allegations against the president.

“I know this sounds funny to people there at home. I never thought USD 130,000 was a real payment, it’s a nuisance payment. When it was real or a real possibility, it’s a million dollars, not USD 130,000,” he asserted.

Click/tap on a tag for more on the subject


Of late

More like this