24.2 C
New Delhi
Tuesday 18 February 2020

AIMPLB: Won’t give anyone ‘land of Babri Masjid’

While the AIMPLB expressed satisfaction at the way Rajeev Dhavan was arguing the Muslim case for Ayodhya, the temple demolition theory they refused to believe in is supported by archaeological findings whose authenticity the advocates for the Muslim party to the dispute have accepted

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has denied any compromise outside the court in the Ayodhya land-title case aka Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case. The executive committee of the AIMPLB met in the capital of Uttar Pradesh on Saturday.

A press release was issued after the meeting chaired by Mohammad Rabey Hasani Nadwi. It said that the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case could not be decided outside the court. According to the AIMPLB, the legal process, in this case, is in its final stage. The “land of Babri Masjid” will not be given to any opposition party, the release says.

The AIMPLB said that not only the country but the world community also were observing the court proceedings. Notwithstanding the archaeological findings, the board said that the mosque was not built over the debris of any temple. The board expressed satisfaction with the advocacy of Muslim parties in the Supreme Court by Rajeev Dhavan.

Ironically, on 26 September, after questioning the ASI report in the Supreme Court in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute case, the Muslim side had reversed its stand and apologised for expressing doubt over the scientific finding. Rajeev Dhavan, advocate for the Muslim side, had apologised for questioning the report of the Archaeological Survey of India before the constitutional bench of five judges hearing the case.

The AIMPLB expressed confidence that the court’s decision would be in favour of the Muslim parties.

The case is being heard daily in the Supreme Court. Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi has asked both the parties to complete the debate in this case by 18 October. The CJI is retiring in November. In such a situation, there are speculations that a decision will be taken in this matter before he retires.

The AIMPLB seized the opportunity to express its well-known opposition to the Uniform Civil Code (UCC). The Personal Law Board said that a uniform civil code is a “threat to the diversity” of the country. If the court and Parliament were to try to implement a UCC, it would be opposed tooth and nail.

The board said further that the constitutional validity of the triple talaq law will be challenged, too.

Related

Triple talaq is now a punishable offence in India

Stay on top - Get daily news in your email inbox

Sirf Views

Tapas Pal, A Death No One Would Genuinely Condole

In 1980, after Bengali film superstar Uttam Kumar died, Dadar Kirti of Tarun Majumdar was released after Durga Puja. The voice...

Must India Invest In Donald Trump?

As many of his cabinet picks know, to their eternal regret and shame, his commitment lasts only as long as you are gullible

Protesters Need Economic Education, Mr Bhagwat

There is no escape from misery unless teams of economic educators convince all sections of society socialism is the cause of their distress

BJP Could Not Have Won With This Approach To Delhi

From not paying attention to the corruption-ridden MCD to aloof leaders whose houses witnessed no activity during campaigns, BJP went all wrong in the Delhi assembly election

AAP Win In Delhi Was Foregone Conclusion: 5 Reasons

The five factors that contributed to the AAP victory have been arranged in the decreasing order of relevance; the first three will remain constant for a few more Delhi elections

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this: