18.5 C
New Delhi
Monday 27 January 2020

5 reasons why woman who accused CJI of sexual harassment walked out of probe

In short, the complainant does not have faith in the institution of the Supreme Court in-house committee to deliver her justice. Here's how she elaborated on it

New Delhi: Former Supreme Court employee who accused against Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi of sexual harassment has refused to appear before Justice Bobde-led internal inquiry committee (In-House Committee) of the Supreme Court, citing lack of trust in the institution to get her justice.

The complainant woman has alleged that she has not been allowed to take along with her lawyer while facing the House Committee and that she is feeling nervous before the honourable judges of the Supreme Court without the lawyer and assistant.

The woman has issued a press release in this regard, in which she said that she was not expected to get justice from this committee, so she would not take part in the proceedings.

The in-house committee of the Supreme Court to investigate the allegations against the Chief Justice of India, comprised, besides Justice Bobde, Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice Indu Malhotra.

The complainant said the woman had requested an external committee to investigate the matter, even though she had joined the probe of the committee on 26 and 29 April.

The complainant has cited three reasons for not being present in front of the committee. Or five.

One, during the hearing, she did not get the permission to take along the lawyer or the assistant staff to the committee hearing; in their absence, she became nervous and afraid.

Two, the committee’s hearing is not being shot on camera or even audio recorded.

Three, a copy of her statement given on 26 and 29 April has not been given to her. She has not been informed about how the committee would work.

Four, when the committee asked her about presenting some witnesses, the complainant said not all witnesses are working independently in the Supreme Court.

Five, in her press release, the complainant also claimed that after the hearing on 26 and 29 April, some bikers followed her and now she is scared for her life.

Stay on top - Get daily news in your email inbox

Sirf Views

Soros Loves To Play Messiah To The Miserable

The opportunity to throw breadcrumbs massages the ego of NGOs supremacists run; the megalomaniac Soros is a personification of that ego

Pandits: 30 Years Since Being Ripped Apart

Pandits say, and rightly so, that their return to Kashmir cannot be pushed without ensuring a homeland for the Islam-ravaged community for conservation of their culture

Fear-Mongering In The Times Of CAA

No one lived in this country with so much fear before,” asserted a friend while dealing with India's newly amended citizenship...

CAA: Never Let A Good Crisis Go To Waste

So said Winston Churchill, a lesson for sure for Prime Miniter Narendra Modi who will use the opposition's calumny over CAA to his advantage

Archbishop Of Bangalore Spreading Canards About CAA

The letter of Archbishop Peter Machado to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, published in The Indian Express, is ridden with factual inaccuracies

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

For fearless journalism

%d bloggers like this: