Sunday 29 November 2020
- Advertisement -

5 reasons why woman who accused CJI of sexual harassment walked out of probe

In short, the complainant does not have faith in the institution of the Supreme Court in-house committee to deliver her justice. Here's how she elaborated on it

- Advertisement -
Politics India 5 reasons why woman who accused CJI of sexual harassment walked out...

New Delhi: Former Supreme Court employee who accused against Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi of sexual harassment has refused to appear before Justice Bobde-led internal inquiry committee (In-House Committee) of the Supreme Court, citing lack of trust in the institution to get her justice.

The complainant woman has alleged that she has not been allowed to take along with her lawyer while facing the House Committee and that she is feeling nervous before the honourable judges of the Supreme Court without the lawyer and assistant.

The woman has issued a press release in this regard, in which she said that she was not expected to get justice from this committee, so she would not take part in the proceedings.

The in-house committee of the Supreme Court to investigate the allegations against the Chief Justice of India, comprised, besides Justice Bobde, Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice Indu Malhotra.

The complainant said the woman had requested an external committee to investigate the matter, even though she had joined the probe of the committee on 26 and 29 April.

The complainant has cited three reasons for not being present in front of the committee. Or five.

One, during the hearing, she did not get the permission to take along the lawyer or the assistant staff to the committee hearing; in their absence, she became nervous and afraid.

Two, the committee’s hearing is not being shot on camera or even audio recorded.

Three, a copy of her statement given on 26 and 29 April has not been given to her. She has not been informed about how the committee would work.

Four, when the committee asked her about presenting some witnesses, the complainant said not all witnesses are working independently in the Supreme Court.

Five, in her press release, the complainant also claimed that after the hearing on 26 and 29 April, some bikers followed her and now she is scared for her life.

- Advertisement -

Views

Hindu Censored By Social Media Too

Since late 2017, as the social media companies got surefooted of their stranglehold over conversations in India, views of Hinduism and Sanatana Dharma have...
- Advertisement -

Interfaith Marriage Fraught With Risks Even Sans Love Jihad

Inter-faith marriages are being utilised as tools to facilitate irreversible changes to India's religious demography by the vested interests who dream of 'Abrahamising' India and finally complete their unfinished agenda

World Order Is Changing: 2+2 Takeaway

The world is reordering itself to resist Chinese moves with the US, France, Britain and allied countries moving towards military partnerships

Related news

Supreme Court comes to the rescue of Arnab Goswami

While the Supreme Court issued a contempt notice to the secretary of Maharashtra assembly on a privilege issue, media is viewing it as a bias in favour of the journalist in the abetment of suicide case
- Advertisement -
%d bloggers like this: